Literature DB >> 20100733

The 'blood group O problem' in kidney transplantation--time to change?

Petra Glander1, Klemens Budde, Danilo Schmidt, T Florian Fuller, Markus Giessing, Hans-Hellmut Neumayer, Lutz Liefeldt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with blood group O have disadvantages in the allocation of deceased donor organs in the Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation System and fewer ABO-compatible living donors. In order to investigate the consequences of this dilemma, we analysed the outcome of patients with blood group O in our transplantation programme.
METHODS: A single-centre analysis of 1186 waitlisted patients for first deceased donor kidney transplantations between 1996 and 2008 was performed, and the mechanisms of blood group-dependent differences for graft and recipient outcome were assessed.
RESULTS: Median follow-up time until death or end of observation for all waitlisted patients was 66 months (range, 0-158 months) and for 589 recipients of a kidney graft was 61 months (range, 0-158 months). Patients with blood group O had significantly longer waiting times for deceased donor kidney grafts, compared to non-group O recipients (median waiting time, 85 vs 59 months). As a consequence, blood group O patients had an increased risk for death without transplantation (13.1% for O patients vs 9.6% for non-O patients; P < 0.05). Despite a good human leukocyte antigen match, graft outcome tended to be worse in O recipients; 14.1% (95% CI, 8.2-19.9%) of all O kidneys from deceased donors were transplanted into non-O recipients, leading to the accumulation of O recipients on the waiting list.
CONCLUSIONS: The export of blood group O donor kidneys to other blood groups leads to longer waiting times, to a higher death rate and to accumulation of blood group O patients on the waiting list, which will further aggravate the problem in the future. Our results should prompt further research on the issues associated with blood group O. Current allocation systems and living donor kidney exchange programmes should be re-evaluated to address this problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20100733     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfp779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  5 in total

1.  Kidney transplantation from deceased donors with elevated serum creatinine.

Authors:  Anja Gallinat; Sabine Leerhoff; Andreas Paul; Ernesto P Molmenti; Maren Schulze; Oliver Witzke; Georgios C Sotiropoulos
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Underutilization of A2 ABO incompatible kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Robert R Redfield; Ronald F Parsons; Eduardo Rodriguez; Moiz Mustafa; James Cassuto; Kumar Vivek; Hooman Noorchashm; Ali Naji; Matthew H Levine; Peter L Abt
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 2.863

3.  Factors Underlying Racial Disparity in Utilization of Hepatitis C-Viremic Kidneys in the United States.

Authors:  Kofi Atiemo; Robin Baudier; Rebecca Craig-Schapiro; Kexin Guo; Nikhilesh Mazumder; Amanda Anderson; Lihui Zhao; Daniela Ladner
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2022-08-23

4.  Factors affecting mortality during the waiting time for kidney transplantation: A nationwide population-based cohort study using the Korean Network for Organ Sharing (KONOS) database.

Authors:  Sunhwa Lee; Kyung Don Yoo; Jung Nam An; Yun Kyu Oh; Chun Soo Lim; Yon Su Kim; Jung Pyo Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Predicting 3-Year Survival in Patients Receiving Maintenance Dialysis: An External Validation of iChoose Kidney in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Vivian S Tan; Amit X Garg; Eric McArthur; Rachel E Patzer; Jennifer Gander; Pavel Roshanov; S Joseph Kim; Greg A Knoll; Seychelle Yohanna; Megan K McCallum; Kyla L Naylor
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2018-10-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.