Literature DB >> 20100585

Comparison of the primary rat spinal cord cell (RSC) assay and the mouse bioassay for botulinum neurotoxin type A potency determination.

Sabine Pellett1, William H Tepp, Stephen I Toth, Eric A Johnson.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) type A is increasingly used in humans for pharmaceutical and cosmetic purposes. Currently, the standard assay used to determine potency of clinical samples, and the only assay approved by the FDA, is the in vivo mouse bioassay (MBA). However, due to several drawbacks of this assay (relatively large error, high cost, no standardization, requirement of high technical expertise, and use of large numbers of mice), there is an increasing need to replace this assay. A cell-based assay using primary rat spinal cord cells (RSC assay) has been previously reported to sensitively detect purified botulinum neurotoxin type A, and requires all biological properties of the toxin for detection.
METHODS: This study presents data on quantitative detection of potency of purified BoNT/A by a cell-based assay, using primary rat spinal cord cells (RSC assay). The sensitivity and error rate of the RSC assay was directly compared to the currently used mouse bioassay by repeated testing of the same purified BoNT/A sample by both assays. In addition, the potency of several samples of purified BoNT/A of unknown activity was determined in parallel by RSC assay and MBA.
RESULTS: The results indicate sensitivity of the RSC assay similar to the mouse bioassay, high reproducibility, and a lower error rate than the mouse bioassay. Direct comparison of potency determination of several purified BoNT/A samples by RSC assay and MBA resulted in very similar values, indicating very good correlation. DISCUSSION: These data support the use of a cell-based assay for potency determination of purified BoNT/A as an alternative to the mouse bioassay. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20100585     DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2010.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods        ISSN: 1056-8719            Impact factor:   1.950


  34 in total

1.  Targeting botulinum A cellular toxicity: a prodrug approach.

Authors:  Peter Silhár; Lisa M Eubanks; Hajime Seki; Sabine Pellett; Sacha Javor; William H Tepp; Eric A Johnson; Kim D Janda
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Activity of botulinum neurotoxin type D (strain 1873) in human neurons.

Authors:  Sabine Pellett; William H Tepp; Jacob M Scherf; Christina L Pier; Eric A Johnson
Journal:  Toxicon       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.033

3.  Enhancing toxin-based vaccines against botulism.

Authors:  Amanda Przedpelski; William H Tepp; Madison Zuverink; Eric A Johnson; Sabine Pellet; Joseph T Barbieri
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  A Novel Botulinum Neurotoxin, Previously Reported as Serotype H, Has a Hybrid-Like Structure With Regions of Similarity to the Structures of Serotypes A and F and Is Neutralized With Serotype A Antitoxin.

Authors:  Susan E Maslanka; Carolina Lúquez; Janet K Dykes; William H Tepp; Christina L Pier; Sabine Pellett; Brian H Raphael; Suzanne R Kalb; John R Barr; Agam Rao; Eric A Johnson
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 5.  Recent developments in cell-based assays and stem cell technologies for botulinum neurotoxin research and drug discovery.

Authors:  Erkan Kiris; Krishna P Kota; James C Burnett; Veronica Soloveva; Christopher D Kane; Sina Bavari
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 5.225

6.  Rapid immune responses to a botulinum neurotoxin Hc subunit vaccine through in vivo targeting to antigen-presenting cells.

Authors:  David M White; Sabine Pellett; Mark A Jensen; William H Tepp; Eric A Johnson; Barry G W Arnason
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Substrate cleavage and duration of action of botulinum neurotoxin type FA ("H, HA").

Authors:  Sabine Pellett; William H Tepp; Guangyun Lin; Eric A Johnson
Journal:  Toxicon       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.033

8.  Botulinum neurotoxin subtype A2 enters neuronal cells faster than subtype A1.

Authors:  Christina L Pier; Chen Chen; William H Tepp; Guangyun Lin; Kim D Janda; Joseph T Barbieri; Sabine Pellett; Eric A Johnson
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 4.124

9.  Synthesis/biological evaluation of hydroxamic acids and their prodrugs as inhibitors for Botulinum neurotoxin A light chain.

Authors:  Hajime Seki; Sabine Pellett; Peter Silhár; G Neil Stowe; Beatriz Blanco; Matthew A Lardy; Eric A Johnson; Kim D Janda
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Model for studying Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin using differentiated motor neuron-like NG108-15 cells.

Authors:  Regina C M Whitemarsh; Christina L Pier; William H Tepp; Sabine Pellett; Eric A Johnson
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 3.575

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.