Smita Nambiar1, Ian Hughes, Peter Sw Davies. 1. School of Medicine, Children's Nutrition Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia. s.nambiar@uq.edu.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) assesses abdominal adiposity and has been proposed to be of greater value in predicting obesity-related cardiovascular health risks in children than BMI. The present study aims to develop WHtR cut-offs for overweight and obesity based on the 85th and 95th percentiles for the percentage body fat (%BF) in a cohort of children and adolescents. DESIGN: Waist circumference (WC), height, triceps and subscapular skinfolds were used to calculate WHtR and %BF. Correlations between WHtR and %BF and WHtR/mid-abdominal skinfold were made. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to select WHtR cut-offs to define overweight and obesity. Subjects were grouped by WHtR cut-offs, and mean values for anthropometry, blood lipids and blood pressure (BP) variables were compared. SETTING: Australian primary and secondary schools. SUBJECTS: A total of 2773 male (M) and female (F) subjects of the 1985 Australian Health and Fitness Survey, aged 8-16 years. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients between WHtR and %BF were M: r = 0.73, F: r = 0.60, P < 0.01 and WHtR/mid-abdominal skinfold were M: r = 0.78, F: r = 0.65, P < 0.01. WHtR of 0.46(M) and 0.45(F) best identified subjects with > or = 85th percentile for %BF and 0.48(M) and 0.47(F) identified subjects with > or = 95th percentile for %BF. When comparing the highest WHtR group to the lowest, both sexes had significantly higher means for weight, WC, %BF, TG (male subjects only), systolic BP (female subjects only) and lower means for HDL cholesterol (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: WHtR is useful in clinical and population health as it identifies children with higher %BF at greater risk of developing weight-related CVD at an earlier age.
OBJECTIVE: The waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) assesses abdominal adiposity and has been proposed to be of greater value in predicting obesity-related cardiovascular health risks in children than BMI. The present study aims to develop WHtR cut-offs for overweight and obesity based on the 85th and 95th percentiles for the percentage body fat (%BF) in a cohort of children and adolescents. DESIGN: Waist circumference (WC), height, triceps and subscapular skinfolds were used to calculate WHtR and %BF. Correlations between WHtR and %BF and WHtR/mid-abdominal skinfold were made. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to select WHtR cut-offs to define overweight and obesity. Subjects were grouped by WHtR cut-offs, and mean values for anthropometry, blood lipids and blood pressure (BP) variables were compared. SETTING: Australian primary and secondary schools. SUBJECTS: A total of 2773 male (M) and female (F) subjects of the 1985 Australian Health and Fitness Survey, aged 8-16 years. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients between WHtR and %BF were M: r = 0.73, F: r = 0.60, P < 0.01 and WHtR/mid-abdominal skinfold were M: r = 0.78, F: r = 0.65, P < 0.01. WHtR of 0.46(M) and 0.45(F) best identified subjects with > or = 85th percentile for %BF and 0.48(M) and 0.47(F) identified subjects with > or = 95th percentile for %BF. When comparing the highest WHtR group to the lowest, both sexes had significantly higher means for weight, WC, %BF, TG (male subjects only), systolic BP (female subjects only) and lower means for HDL cholesterol (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: WHtR is useful in clinical and population health as it identifies children with higher %BF at greater risk of developing weight-related CVD at an earlier age.
Authors: Amy S Paller; Katherine Mercy; Mary J Kwasny; Siew Eng Choon; Kelly M Cordoro; Giampiero Girolomoni; Alan Menter; Wynnis L Tom; Anne M Mahoney; Annet M Oostveen; Marieke M B Seyger Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: Amy Jennings; Aedín Cassidy; Esther M F van Sluijs; Simon J Griffin; Ailsa A Welch Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2012-03-22 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Carla Moreira; Rute Santos; Susana Vale; Paula C Santos; Sandra Abreu; Ana I Marques; Luísa Soares-Miranda; Jorge Mota Journal: J Obes Date: 2011-07-11