Literature DB >> 20100240

Allometry and spatial scales of foraging in mammalian herbivores.

Emilio A Laca1, Susanne Sokolow, Julio R Galli, Carlos A Cangiano.   

Abstract

Herbivores forage in spatially complex habitats. Due to allometry and scale-dependent foraging, herbivores are hypothesized to perceive and respond to heterogeneity of resources at scales relative to their body sizes. This hypothesis has not been manipulatively tested for animals with only moderate differences in body size and similar food niches. We compared short-term spatial foraging behavior of two herbivores (sheep and cattle) with similar dietary niche but differing body size. Although intake rates scaled allometrically with body mass (mass(0.75)), spatial foraging strategies substantially differed, with cattle exhibiting a coarser-grained use of the 'foodscape.' Selectivity by cattle (and not sheep) for their preferred food was more restricted when patches were smaller (< 10 m(2)). We conclude that differences in spatial scales of selection offers a plausible mechanism by which species can coexist on shared resources that exhibit multiple scales of spatial heterogeneity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20100240     DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01423.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  16 in total

Review 1.  Generalities in grazing and browsing ecology: using across-guild comparisons to control contingencies.

Authors:  Johan T du Toit; Han Olff
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The relative and combined effects of herbivore assemblage and soil nitrogen on plant diversity.

Authors:  Minna Zhang; Bai Liu; Guangyin Li; Yingying Kuang; Xiuquan Yue; Shicheng Jiang; Jushan Liu; Ling Wang
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 6.038

3.  Large grazers modify effects of aboveground-belowground interactions on small-scale plant community composition.

Authors:  G F Ciska Veen; Elzemiek Geuverink; Han Olff
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Body mass explains characteristic scales of habitat selection in terrestrial mammals.

Authors:  Jason T Fisher; Brad Anholt; John P Volpe
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Fine-Scale Habitat Heterogeneity Influences Occupancy in Terrestrial Mammals in a Temperate Region of Australia.

Authors:  Ingrid Stirnemann; Alessio Mortelliti; Philip Gibbons; David B Lindenmayer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Individual-area relationship best explains goose species density in wetlands.

Authors:  Yong Zhang; Qiang Jia; Herbert H T Prins; Lei Cao; Willem Fred de Boer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Nutritional correlates of koala persistence in a low-density population.

Authors:  Eleanor Stalenberg; Ian R Wallis; Ross B Cunningham; Chris Allen; William J Foley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Plant trait assembly affects superiority of grazer's foraging strategies in species-rich grasslands.

Authors:  Jan Mládek; Pavla Mládková; Pavla Hejcmanová; Miroslav Dvorský; Vilém Pavlu; Francesco De Bello; Martin Duchoslav; Michal Hejcman; Robin J Pakeman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Scale-dependent bi-trophic interactions in a semi-arid savanna: how herbivores eliminate benefits of nutrient patchiness to plants.

Authors:  Cornelis van der Waal; Hans de Kroon; Frank van Langevelde; Willem F de Boer; Ignas M A Heitkönig; Rob Slotow; Yolanda Pretorius; Herbert H T Prins
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  How does the foraging behavior of large herbivores cause different associational plant defenses?

Authors:  Yue Huang; Ling Wang; Deli Wang; De-Hui Zeng; Chen Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.