Literature DB >> 20100177

Distinction of conjunctival melanocytic nevi from melanomas by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Klaus J Busam1, Yuqiang Fang, Suresh C Jhanwar, Melissa P Pulitzer, Brian Marr, David H Abramson.   

Abstract

A conjunctival melanocytic nevus may on occasion be difficult to distinguish from melanoma both clinically and histopathologically. An unambiguous correct diagnosis is critical because of major differences in management and prognosis. We evaluated a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay, which has previously been shown to be of value for the diagnosis of melanocytic nevi and melanomas of the skin, using probes targeting 6p25 (RREB1), 6q23 (MYB), 11q13 (CCND1) and centromere 6 (CEP6), for its potential to assist in the distinction of conjunctival melanocytic nevi from melanomas. Four melanocytic nevi and eight melanomas of the conjunctiva were analyzed. Two of the melanomas were diagnostically problematic because of suboptimal histopathology. None of the conjunctival melanocytic nevi showed a level of chromosomal aberrations that met FISH criteria for a diagnosis of melanoma. All eight conjunctival melanomas (six unequivocal and two suspicious lesions) met FISH criteria for melanoma. Thus, results from FISH assay targeting 6p25, 6q23, 11q13 and centromere 6 correlated well with the histopathologic diagnoses and supported the histopathologic suspicion in two problem cases. The findings encourage further exploration of this technique as an ancillary method for the work-up of conjunctival melanocytic proliferations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20100177     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.2009.01488.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cutan Pathol        ISSN: 0303-6987            Impact factor:   1.587


  9 in total

Review 1.  Advances in the management of conjunctival melanoma.

Authors:  Gargi K Vora; Hakan Demirci; Brian Marr; Prithvi Mruthyunjaya
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 6.048

2.  RREB1 transcription factor splice variants in urologic cancer.

Authors:  Matthew D Nitz; Michael A Harding; Steven C Smith; Shibu Thomas; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Conjunctival Blue Naevus in an Anophthalmic Socket.

Authors:  Hibba Quhill; Paul A Rundle; Hardeep Singh Mudhar
Journal:  Ocul Oncol Pathol       Date:  2017-03-09

4.  Assessment of copy number status of chromosomes 6 and 11 by FISH provides independent prognostic information in primary melanoma.

Authors:  Jeffrey P North; John T Vetto; Rajmohan Murali; Kevin P White; Clifton R White; Boris C Bastian
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Comparison between melanoma gene expression score and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the classification of melanocytic lesions.

Authors:  Eugen C Minca; Rami N Al-Rohil; Min Wang; Paul W Harms; Jennifer S Ko; Angela M Collie; Ivanka Kovalyshyn; Victor G Prieto; Michael T Tetzlaff; Steven D Billings; Aleodor A Andea
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 6.  Through the looking glass and what you find there: making sense of comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization for melanoma diagnosis.

Authors:  Jayson Miedema; Aleodor A Andea
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 7.  Conjunctival melanoma and melanocytic intra-epithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  N Kenawy; S L Lake; S E Coupland; B E Damato
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  A juvenile case of conjunctival atypical nevus.

Authors:  Cristina Colarossi; Mario Milazzo; Milena Paglierani; Daniela Massi; Lorenzo Memeo; Vincenzo Canzonieri
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 2.644

Review 9.  Update on conjunctival pathology.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh Mudhar
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.848

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.