Literature DB >> 20100154

Arm lymphoedema in a cohort of breast cancer survivors 10 years after diagnosis.

Karin Johansson1, Elin Branje.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Arm lymphoedema is a frequent complication after breast cancer treatment. Early diagnosis and treatment is considered important for successful management of breast cancer related arm lymphoedema (BCRL). The purpose was to identify BCRL incidence, time of onset, progression/regression and associated factors 10 years after breast cancer diagnosis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two hundred and ninety two patients treated with axillary node dissection and radiotherapy were included in this retrospective study. A total of 111 diagnosed with BCRL (incidence 38.7%). Of these women 98 were followed for up to 10 years after BCRL diagnosis. Forty consecutive patients registered with no BCRL were included in the control group. BCRL was defined as an increase in arm volume difference >or=5% and an increased thickness of subcutis. Follow-up was performed twice a year, including assessment of lymphoedema relative volume (LRV) by water displacement method and compression treatment. Additional intensive treatment was given if LRV increased by more than 5% since the previous visit or exceeded 20% in total.
RESULTS: Mean LRV was 8.1 +/-3.6% at diagnosis and 9.0+/-6.7% at last follow-up measurement (mean 48.9+/-39.2 months) with no significant difference. There was no difference in progression of LRV between groups with early versus late diagnosis (within or after 12 months postoperatively), small (5-<10%) versus large (>or=10%) LRV at time of diagnosis, or regular (at least twice a year) versus non-regular treatment. More BCRL patients with large LRV at diagnosis (15.8%), exceeded LRV >or=20% during follow-up time, than patients with small LRV at diagnosis (10.1%).
CONCLUSION: BCRL can be identified at an early stage both in regard to time of diagnosis after operation and to edema volume, and that edema volume can be kept at a low level for at least 10 years. Small LRV at time of diagnosis appears to be more important for minimizing the progression of LRV than time of diagnosis after operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20100154     DOI: 10.3109/02841860903483676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  18 in total

1.  Exercise for breast cancer survivors: bridging the gap between evidence and practice.

Authors:  Sandra C Hayes; Karin Johansson; Catherine M Alfano; Kathryn Schmitz
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 2.  Manual lymphatic drainage for lymphedema following breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Jeanette Ezzo; Eric Manheimer; Margaret L McNeely; Doris M Howell; Robert Weiss; Karin I Johansson; Ting Bao; Linda Bily; Catherine M Tuppo; Anne F Williams; Didem Karadibak
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-21

3.  Screening for breast cancer-related lymphedema: the need for standardization.

Authors:  Jean O'Toole; Lauren S Jammallo; Cynthia L Miller; Melissa N Skolny; Michelle C Specht; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-04-10

4.  Lymphoedema and health-related quality of life by early treatment in long-term survivors of breast cancer. A comparative retrospective study up to 15 years after diagnosis.

Authors:  Katarina Y Karlsson; Imke Wallenius; Lena B Nilsson-Wikmar; Henrik Lindman; Birgitta B K Johansson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Complication rates in patients with negative axillary nodes 10 years after local breast radiotherapy after either sentinel lymph node dissection or axillary clearance.

Authors:  A Gabriella Wernicke; Michael Shamis; Kulbir K Sidhu; Bruce C Turner; Yevgenyia Goltser; Imraan Khan; Paul J Christos; Lydia T Komarnicky-Kocher
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.339

6.  Diagnosis and treatment of lymphedema after breast cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Oksana Sayko; Liliana E Pezzin; Tina W F Yen; Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 2.298

7.  The results of the intensive phase of complete decongestive therapy and the determination of predictive factors for response to treatment in patients with breast cancer related-lymphedema.

Authors:  Dilek Keskin; Meltem Dalyan; Sibel Ünsal-Delialioğlu; Ülkü Düzlü-Öztürk
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-01-03

8.  Best Practice Guidelines in Assessment, Risk Reduction, Management, and Surveillance for Post-Breast Cancer Lymphedema.

Authors:  Jane M Armer; Jennifer M Hulett; Michael Bernas; Pam Ostby; Bob R Stewart; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2013-06

9.  A Murine Tail Lymphedema Model.

Authors:  Aladdin H Hassanein; Mithun Sinha; Colby R Neumann; Ganesh Mohan; Imran Khan; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  The use of rehabilitation among patients with breast cancer: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Yi-Hsien Lin; Po-Jung Pan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.