Literature DB >> 20100110

What happened? GPs' perceptions of consultation outcomes and a comparison with the experiences of their patients.

A Andén1, M André, C E Rudebeck.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate GPs' perceptions of consultation outcomes and to investigate the associations between these and outcomes perceived by the patients.
DESIGN: 25 GPs and 10 patients for each GP filled in a questionnaire about the outcome of the same consultation. The questions in the questionnaires were formulated from concepts found in preceding qualitative studies. Their answers were analysed and compared.
SETTING: GPs and patients from 16 group practices in Norrbotten, Sweden.
RESULTS: The GPs had the apprehension that their consultations would lead to cure/symptom relief in half of their consultations. They believed that their patients were satisfied up to 90% and that up to 75% had been reassured, understood more or could cope better. The GPs were satisfied themselves with up to 95% of the consultations, they enhanced their relationship to their patient up to 70%. Their affirmative concordance with their patients was high regarding satisfaction, intermediate regarding patient reassurance and patient understanding and lowest regarding cure/symptom relief.
CONCLUSION: The GPs' were lacking in their ability to assess the patients' increased understanding and the concordance between their own and the patients' expectation of cure/symptom relief was low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20100110     DOI: 10.3109/13814780903528587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract        ISSN: 1381-4788            Impact factor:   1.904


  4 in total

1.  Priority setting in general practice: health priorities of older patients differ from treatment priorities of their physicians.

Authors:  Isabel Voigt; Jennifer Wrede; Heike Diederichs-Egidi; Marie-Luise Dierks; Ulrike Junius-Walker
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.351

2.  The Missing Evaluation at the End of GP's Consultation.

Authors:  Maisa Kuusela; Paula Vainiomäki; Anni Kiviranta; Päivi Rautava
Journal:  Int J Family Med       Date:  2013-01-08

3.  Multimorbidity: can general practitioners identify the health conditions most important to their patients? Results from a national cross-sectional study in Switzerland.

Authors:  Anouk Déruaz-Luyet; Alexandra A N'Goran; Jérôme Pasquier; Bernard Burnand; Patrick Bodenmann; Stefan Zechmann; Stefan Neuner-Jehle; Nicolas Senn; Daniel Widmer; Sven Streit; Andreas Zeller; Dagmar M Haller; Lilli Herzig
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 4.  Patient experience studies in the circumpolar region: a scoping review.

Authors:  Christine Ingemann; Nathaniel Fox Hansen; Nanna Lund Hansen; Kennedy Jensen; Christina Viskum Lytken Larsen; Susan Chatwood
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.