| Literature DB >> 20099757 |
A Samie1, R L Guerrant, L Barrett, P O Bessong, E O Igumbor, C L Obi.
Abstract
In the present study, a cross-sectional survey of intestinal parasitic and bacterial infections in relation to diarrhoea in Vhembe district and the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of isolated bacterial pathogens was conducted. Stool samples were collected from 528 patients attending major public hospitals and 295 children attending two public primary schools and were analyzed by standard microbiological and parasitological techniques. Entamoeba histolytica/E. dispar (34.2%) and Cryptosporidium spp. (25.5%) were the most common parasitic causes of diarrhoea among the hospital attendees while Giardia lamblia (12.8%) was the most common cause of diarrhoea among the primary school children (p < 0.05). Schistosoma mansoni (14.4%) was more common in non-diarrhoeal samples at both hospitals (16.9%) and schools (17.6%). Campylobacter spp. (24.9%), Aeromonas spp. (20.8%), and Shigella spp. (8.5%) were the most common bacterial causes of diarrhoea among the hospital attendees while Campylobacter (12.8%) and Aeromonas spp. (12.8%) were most common in diarrhoeal samples from school children. Vibrio spp. was less common (3% in the hospitals) and were all associated with diarrhoea. Antimicrobial resistance was common among the bacterial isolates but ceftriaxone (91%) and ciprofloxacin (88.6%) showed stronger activities against all the organisms. The present study has demonstrated that E. histolytica/dispar, Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and Cyclospora are common parasitic causes of diarrhoea in Vhembe district while Campylobacter spp. and Aeromonas are the most common bacterial causes of diarrhoea in Vhembe district of South Africa.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 20099757 PMCID: PMC2928113 DOI: 10.3329/jhpn.v27i6.4325
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Popul Nutr ISSN: 1606-0997 Impact factor: 2.000
Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections among hospital attendees and school children in the Venda region
| Parasitic organism | Samples from hospital (n= 528) | Samples from schools (n= 295) | ||||||
| Diarrhoeal (n=269) No. (%) | Non-diarrhoeal (n-259) No. (%) | Total no. (%) | Significance (p value) | Diarrhoeal (n=39) No. (%) | Non-diarrhoeal (n=256) No. (%) | Total no. (%) | Significance (p value) | |
| 92 (34.2) | 24 (9.3) | 116 (22) | <0.0001 | 3 (7.7) | 7 (2.7) | 10 (3.4) | 0.111 | |
| 68 (25.3) | 46 (17.7) | 104 (19.7) | 0.036 | 7 (17.9) | 37(14.4) | 44 (14.9) | 0.568 | |
| 48 (17.8) | 5 (1.9) | 53 (10) | <0.0001 | 3 (7.7) | 5 (2) | 8 (2.7) | 0.040 | |
| 36 (13.4) | 29 (11.2) | 65 (12.3) | 0.445 | 2 (5.1) | 12 (4.7) | 14 (4.7) | 0.904 | |
| 19 (7) | 11 (4.2) | 30 (5.6) | 0.162 | 3 (7.7) | 5 (2) | 8 (2.7) | 0.040 | |
| 41 (15.2) | 13 (5) | 54 (10.2) | 0.0001 | 5 (12.8) | 7 (2.7) | 12 (4.1) | 0.003 | |
| 16 (6) | 13 (5) | 29 (5.5) | 0.640 | 0 (0) | 2 (0.8) | 2 (0.6) | 0.580 | |
| 32 (11.9) | 6 (2.3) | 38 (7.2) | 0.0001 | 3 (7.7) | 0 (0) | 3 (1.0) | <0.001 | |
| 16 (5.9) | 9 (3.4) | 25 (4.7) | 0.181 | 2 (5.1) | 0 (0) | 2 (0.7) | <0.001 | |
| 24 (8.9) | 19 (7.3) | 43 (8.1) | 0.505 | 3 (7.7) | 4 (1.6) | 7 (2.3) | 0.019 | |
| 28 (10.4) | 22 (8.5) | 50 (9.4) | 0.453 | 4 (10.2) | 19 (7.4) | 23 (7.8) | 0.539 | |
| 28 (10.4) | 17 (6.5) | 45 (8.5) | 0.114 | 2 (5.1) | 4 (1.6) | 6 (2.03) | 0.142 | |
| Hookworms | 31 (11.5) | 28 (10.4) | 59 (11.1) | 0.789 | 5 (12.8) | 18 (7) | 23 (7.7) | 0.209 |
| 32 (11.9) | 44 (16.9) | 76 (14.4) | 0.096 | 4 (10.3) | 45 (17.6) | 49 (16.6) | 0.252 | |
| Multiple infections | 124 (46) | 85 (32.8) | 209 (39.6) | 12 (30.8) | 56 (21.9) | 68 (23) | ||
Isolation rates of bacterial pathogens from stools from hospitals and schools in the Venda region of South Africa
| Bacterial spp. | Hospital samples (n=528) | School samples (n=295) | ||||||
| Diarrhoeal (n=269) No. (%) | Non-diarrhoeal (n=259) No. (%) | Total No. (%) | Significance (p value) | Diarrhoeal (n=39) No. (%) | Non-diarrhoeal (n=256) No. (%) | Total No. (%) | Significance (p value) | |
| 67 (24.9) | 22 (8.4) | 89 (16.8) | <0.0001 | 5 (12.8) | 4 (1.6) | 9 (3.05) | <0.001 | |
| 22 (8.1) | 8 (3) | 30 (5.7) | 0.012 | 3 (7.7) | 4 (1.6) | 7 (2.4) | .019 | |
| 32 (11.9) | 13 (5) | 45 (8.5) | 0.005 | 3 (7.7) | 3 (1.2) | 6 (2) | 0.002 | |
| 56 (20.8) | 16 (6.2) | 78 (14.7) | <0.001 | 5 (12.8) | 2 (0.8) | 7 (2.3) | <0.001 | |
| 24 (8.9) | 0 (0) | 24 (4.5) | <0.001 | 2 (5.1) | 0 (0) | 2 (0.6) | <0.001 | |
| 12 (4.5) | 4 (1.5) | 16 (3) | 0.001 | 1 (2.5) | 1 (0.4) | 2 (0.6) | 0.123 | |
Susceptibility profiles of isolates to 14 different antibiotics
| Bacterial organism | Lom | Aug | G | T | E | Cip | Cx | K | C | Ofx | NA | Ap | Cro | Lzd |
| 86 | 64 | 76 | 71 | 50 | 86 | 0 | 86 | 50 | 83 | 53 | 14 | 92 | 38 | |
| 72 | 50 | 74 | 40 | 0 | 90 | 0 | 75 | 50 | 80 | 50 | 10 | 94 | 42 | |
| 70 | 56 | 79 | 65 | 5 | 89 | 0 | 70 | 21 | 82 | 46 | 13 | 92 | 28 | |
| 65 | 59 | 82 | 63 | 63 | 94 | 6 | 79 | 69 | 97 | 54 | 22 | 85 | 34 | |
| ND | ND | 96 | 38 | 28 | 84 | 2 | 81 | 55 | 86 | 68 | 36 | 92 | ND | |
| Overall susceptibility | 74 | 57 | 81 | 55 | 29 | 89 | 1 | 78 | 47 | 86 | 54 | 19 | 91 | 36 |
Ap=Ampicillin (10 µg); Aug=Augmentin (30 µg); C=Chloramphenicol (30 µg); Cip=Ciprofloxacin (5 µg); Cro=Ceftriaxone (30 µg); Cx=Cloxacillin (5 µg); E=Erythromycin (15 µg); G=Gentamycin (120 µg); K=Kanamycin (30 µg); Lom=Lomefloxacin (10 µg); Lzd= Linezolid (10 µg); NA=Nalidixic acid (30 µg); ND=Not done; Ofx=Ofloxacin (5 µg); T=Tetracycline (30 µg)