PURPOSE: To assess image quality, vessel visualization, preliminary diagnostic properties, and interobserver variability of a novel balanced turbo field echo (b-TFE) sequence and contrast-enhanced T1 fast field echo (CE-FFE) sequence with blood pool agent (BPA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 15 healthy volunteers and six patients with ultrasound-verified proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were examined from the inferior vena cava (IVC) to the proximal calf veins. RESULTS: The great majority of deep veins were completely visualized on both sequences. In healthy volunteers the IVC was completely visualized in five b-TFE and 11 CE-FFE scans, and partially in seven b-TFE and four CE-FFE scans (P = 0.008). Poorest image quality was in the pelvis. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was higher on b-TFE compared to CE-FFE, with significant difference in calf images (P = 0.036). Sensitivity was 100% for proximal DVT with both methods. Specificity was 70% (CE-FFE) and 80% (b-TFE) for proximal femoral DVT; 100% in distal femoral. Interobserver reliability was kappa 1.0 (b-TFE), 0.9 (CE-FFE) for proximal, and overall poor for distal DVT. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhancement did not add valuable information in visualizing deep veins of the lower limbs compared to b-TFE, though the IVC was slightly better visualized. Diagnostic properties and interobserver reliability of both sequences were good for proximal DVT and poor for distal DVT.
PURPOSE: To assess image quality, vessel visualization, preliminary diagnostic properties, and interobserver variability of a novel balanced turbo field echo (b-TFE) sequence and contrast-enhanced T1 fast field echo (CE-FFE) sequence with blood pool agent (BPA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 15 healthy volunteers and six patients with ultrasound-verified proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were examined from the inferior vena cava (IVC) to the proximal calf veins. RESULTS: The great majority of deep veins were completely visualized on both sequences. In healthy volunteers the IVC was completely visualized in five b-TFE and 11 CE-FFE scans, and partially in seven b-TFE and four CE-FFE scans (P = 0.008). Poorest image quality was in the pelvis. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was higher on b-TFE compared to CE-FFE, with significant difference in calf images (P = 0.036). Sensitivity was 100% for proximal DVT with both methods. Specificity was 70% (CE-FFE) and 80% (b-TFE) for proximal femoral DVT; 100% in distal femoral. Interobserver reliability was kappa 1.0 (b-TFE), 0.9 (CE-FFE) for proximal, and overall poor for distal DVT. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhancement did not add valuable information in visualizing deep veins of the lower limbs compared to b-TFE, though the IVC was slightly better visualized. Diagnostic properties and interobserver reliability of both sequences were good for proximal DVT and poor for distal DVT.
Authors: Shreyas S Vasanawala; Kim-Lien Nguyen; Michael D Hope; Mellena D Bridges; Thomas A Hope; Scott B Reeder; Mustafa R Bashir Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Gregory Piazza; Venkatesh Mani; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Michael A Grosso; Michele Mercuri; Hans J Lanz; Steven Schussler; Ching Hsu; Amy Chinigo; Bruce Ritchie; Venkatesh Nadar; Kevin Cannon; John Pullman; Mauricio Concha; Marlin Schul; Zahi A Fayad Journal: Vasc Med Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 3.239
Authors: Felix Ammermann; Felix G Meinel; Ebba Beller; Anke Busse; Felix Streckenbach; Christine Teichert; Malte Weinrich; Andreas Neumann; Marc-André Weber; Thomas Heller Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2020-02-25 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Ole Grøtta; Tone Enden; Gunnar Sandbæk; Gard Filip Gjerdalen; Carl-Erik Slagsvold; Dag Bay; Nils-Einar Kløw; Antonio Rosales Journal: CVIR Endovasc Date: 2018-11-16
Authors: George S Karagiannis; Anthony Bianchi; Luis Rivera Sanchez; Kamal Ambadipudi; Min-Hui Cui; Jesus M Anampa; Saeed Asiry; Yarong Wang; Allison S Harney; Jessica M Pastoriza; Yu Lin; Xiaoming Chen; Joan G Jones; David Entenberg; Dana Haddad; Laura J Hodges; Timothy Q Duong; Joseph A Sparano; Maja H Oktay; Craig A Branch; John S Condeelis Journal: NPJ Breast Cancer Date: 2022-09-02
Authors: Carsten W K P Arnoldussen; Yeelai Lam; Nobutake Ito; Bjorn Winkens; M Eline Kooi; Cees H A Wittens; Joachim E Wildberger Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-07-03 Impact factor: 5.315