Literature DB >> 20099355

Visualization of deep veins and detection of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with balanced turbo field echo (b-TFE) and contrast-enhanced T1 fast field echo (CE-FFE) using a blood pool agent (BPA).

Tone Enden1, Tryggve H Storås, Anne Negård, Ylva Haig, Leiv Sandvik, Kjell-Inge Gjesdal, Per Morten Sandset, Nils-Einar Kløw.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess image quality, vessel visualization, preliminary diagnostic properties, and interobserver variability of a novel balanced turbo field echo (b-TFE) sequence and contrast-enhanced T1 fast field echo (CE-FFE) sequence with blood pool agent (BPA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 15 healthy volunteers and six patients with ultrasound-verified proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were examined from the inferior vena cava (IVC) to the proximal calf veins.
RESULTS: The great majority of deep veins were completely visualized on both sequences. In healthy volunteers the IVC was completely visualized in five b-TFE and 11 CE-FFE scans, and partially in seven b-TFE and four CE-FFE scans (P = 0.008). Poorest image quality was in the pelvis. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was higher on b-TFE compared to CE-FFE, with significant difference in calf images (P = 0.036). Sensitivity was 100% for proximal DVT with both methods. Specificity was 70% (CE-FFE) and 80% (b-TFE) for proximal femoral DVT; 100% in distal femoral. Interobserver reliability was kappa 1.0 (b-TFE), 0.9 (CE-FFE) for proximal, and overall poor for distal DVT.
CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhancement did not add valuable information in visualizing deep veins of the lower limbs compared to b-TFE, though the IVC was slightly better visualized. Diagnostic properties and interobserver reliability of both sequences were good for proximal DVT and poor for distal DVT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20099355     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  10 in total

Review 1.  Blood pool contrast agents for venous magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Irai S Oliveira; Sandeep S Hedgire; Weier Li; Suvranu Ganguli; Anand M Prabhakar
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-12

Review 2.  Considerations for Imaging the Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) with/without IVC Filters.

Authors:  Jessie Aw-Zoretic; Jeremy D Collins
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Rapid MR venography in children using a blood pool contrast agent and multi-station fat-water-separated volumetric imaging.

Authors:  Pejman Ghanouni; Shannon G Walters; Shreyas S Vasanawala
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-10-12

Review 4.  Safety and technique of ferumoxytol administration for MRI.

Authors:  Shreyas S Vasanawala; Kim-Lien Nguyen; Michael D Hope; Mellena D Bridges; Thomas A Hope; Scott B Reeder; Mustafa R Bashir
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Simultaneous detection of hepatocellular carcinoma and vessel thrombus by using SPIO-enhanced B-TFE with the T2 preparation pulse technique.

Authors:  Masayuki Kanamoto; Tosiaki Miyati; Kazuki Terashima; Kei Katahira; Ryoji Ida; Daisaku Suga; Nobukazu Fuwa
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2017-02-03

6.  Magnetic resonance venography to assess thrombus resolution with edoxaban monotherapy versus parenteral anticoagulation/warfarin for symptomatic deep vein thrombosis: A multicenter feasibility study.

Authors:  Gregory Piazza; Venkatesh Mani; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Michael A Grosso; Michele Mercuri; Hans J Lanz; Steven Schussler; Ching Hsu; Amy Chinigo; Bruce Ritchie; Venkatesh Nadar; Kevin Cannon; John Pullman; Mauricio Concha; Marlin Schul; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.239

7.  Concomitant chronic venous insufficiency in patients with peripheral artery disease: insights from MR angiography.

Authors:  Felix Ammermann; Felix G Meinel; Ebba Beller; Anke Busse; Felix Streckenbach; Christine Teichert; Malte Weinrich; Andreas Neumann; Marc-André Weber; Thomas Heller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Infrainguinal inflow assessment and endovenous stent placement in iliofemoral post-thrombotic obstructions.

Authors:  Ole Grøtta; Tone Enden; Gunnar Sandbæk; Gard Filip Gjerdalen; Carl-Erik Slagsvold; Dag Bay; Nils-Einar Kløw; Antonio Rosales
Journal:  CVIR Endovasc       Date:  2018-11-16

9.  Assessment of MRI to estimate metastatic dissemination risk and prometastatic effects of chemotherapy.

Authors:  George S Karagiannis; Anthony Bianchi; Luis Rivera Sanchez; Kamal Ambadipudi; Min-Hui Cui; Jesus M Anampa; Saeed Asiry; Yarong Wang; Allison S Harney; Jessica M Pastoriza; Yu Lin; Xiaoming Chen; Joan G Jones; David Entenberg; Dana Haddad; Laura J Hodges; Timothy Q Duong; Joseph A Sparano; Maja H Oktay; Craig A Branch; John S Condeelis
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-09-02

10.  Gadobutrol versus gadofosveset-trisodium in MR venography of the lower extremities.

Authors:  Carsten W K P Arnoldussen; Yeelai Lam; Nobutake Ito; Bjorn Winkens; M Eline Kooi; Cees H A Wittens; Joachim E Wildberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 5.315

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.