Literature DB >> 20099298

Molecular analysis reveals a genetic basis for the phenotypic diversity of metaplastic breast carcinomas.

Felipe C Geyer1, Britta Weigelt, Rachael Natrajan, Maryou B K Lambros, Dario de Biase, Radost Vatcheva, Kay Savage, Alan Mackay, Alan Ashworth, Jorge S Reis-Filho.   

Abstract

Cancers may be composed of multiple populations of submodal clones sharing the same initiating genetic lesions, followed by the acquisition of divergent genetic hits. Intra-tumour genetic heterogeneity has profound implications for cancer clinical management. To determine the extent of intra-tumour genetic heterogeneity in breast cancers, and whether the morphological diversity of breast cancers is underpinned by divergent genetic aberrations, we analysed the genomic profiles of microdissected, morphologically distinct components of six metaplastic breast carcinomas, tumours characterized by the presence of morphological areas with divergent differentiation. Each morphologically distinct component was separately microdissected and subjected to high-resolution microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization. Each component was also analysed by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. Clonal relationship between the distinct components was tested by TP53 sequencing and human androgen receptor (HUMARA) X-chromosome inactivation assay. In the majority of cases, all morphologically distinct components from each case were clonal and displayed remarkably similar genetic profiles. In two cases, however, morphologically distinct components harboured specific genetic aberrations. In an adenosquamous carcinoma, the differences were such that only 20% of the genome harboured similar copy number changes. The squamous component displayed EGFR gene amplification, EGFR over-expression and lack of expression of hormone receptors, whereas the lobular component displayed the reverse pattern. The components of a biphasic spindle cell carcinoma harboured similar gains, losses, amplifications of 9p23 and 17q12 (HER2) and identical TP53 mutations, suggesting that these were relatively early events in the development of this tumour; however, each component displayed divergent focal amplifications. Importantly, the metastatic deposit of this case, despite harbouring a TP53 mutation identical to that found in the primary tumour, harboured additional specific focal amplifications. This proof-of-principle study provides direct evidence of intra-tumour genetic heterogeneity in breast cancers, and shows that in some cases morphological diversity may be underpinned by distinct genetic aberrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20099298     DOI: 10.1002/path.2675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  67 in total

Review 1.  Histological types of breast cancer: how special are they?

Authors:  Britta Weigelt; Felipe C Geyer; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 2.  The molecular pathology of breast cancer progression.

Authors:  Alessandro Bombonati; Dennis C Sgroi
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 7.996

3.  Clinicopathologic features and outcomes of metaplastic breast carcinoma: comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  Hyung Seok Park; Seho Park; Joo Hee Kim; Ju-Hyun Lee; So-Young Choi; Byeong-Woo Park; Kyong-Sik Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 4.  Circulating tumour cells and cell-free DNA as tools for managing breast cancer.

Authors:  Leticia De Mattos-Arruda; Javier Cortes; Libero Santarpia; Ana Vivancos; Josep Tabernero; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Joan Seoane
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  The Spectrum of Triple-Negative Breast Disease: High- and Low-Grade Lesions.

Authors:  Felipe C Geyer; Fresia Pareja; Britta Weigelt; Emad Rakha; Ian O Ellis; Stuart J Schnitt; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Whole-Exome Sequencing of Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma Indicates Monoclonality with Associated Ductal Carcinoma Component.

Authors:  Bracha Erlanger Avigdor; Katie Beierl; Christopher D Gocke; Daniel J Zabransky; Karen Cravero; Kelly Kyker-Snowman; Berry Button; David Chu; Sarah Croessmann; Rory L Cochran; Roisin M Connolly; Ben H Park; Sarah J Wheelan; Ashley Cimino-Mathews
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Genetic and phenotypic diversity in breast tumor metastases.

Authors:  Vanessa Almendro; Hee Jung Kim; Yu-Kang Cheng; Mithat Gönen; Shalev Itzkovitz; Pedram Argani; Alexander van Oudenaarden; Saraswati Sukumar; Franziska Michor; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Metaplastic breast carcinoma: more than a special type.

Authors:  Britta Weigelt; Carey Eberle; Catherine F Cowell; Charlotte K Y Ng; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast: diagnostic challenges and new translational insights.

Authors:  Shilpa Rungta; Celina G Kleer
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.534

10.  Inference of tumor evolution during chemotherapy by computational modeling and in situ analysis of genetic and phenotypic cellular diversity.

Authors:  Vanessa Almendro; Yu-Kang Cheng; Amanda Randles; Shalev Itzkovitz; Andriy Marusyk; Elisabet Ametller; Xavier Gonzalez-Farre; Montse Muñoz; Hege G Russnes; Aslaug Helland; Inga H Rye; Anne-Lise Borresen-Dale; Reo Maruyama; Alexander van Oudenaarden; Mitchell Dowsett; Robin L Jones; Jorge Reis-Filho; Pere Gascon; Mithat Gönen; Franziska Michor; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.