Literature DB >> 20098281

Ten-year experience of selective omission of the pretransplant crossmatch test in deceased donor kidney transplantation.

Craig J Taylor1, Vasilis Kosmoliaptsis, Linda D Sharples, Davide Prezzi, C Helen Morgan, Timothy Key, Afzal N Chaudhry, Irum Amin, Menna R Clatworthy, Andrew J Butler, Christopher J E Watson, J Andrew Bradley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A pretransplant lymphocyte crossmatch (XM) test is usually considered mandatory but may delay deceased donor renal transplantation. We report on the safety and clinical efficacy of omitting the XM when it is predicted to be negative based on sensitization history and human leukocyte antigen-specific antibody screening.
METHODS: From 1998 to 2008, 606 deceased donor kidney transplants were performed at our center and the prospective donor-recipient XM omitted in 257 (42%). In all cases, a negative XM was confirmed retrospectively. Four hundred fourteen (68%) kidneys were donated after brain death (DBD) and 192 (32%) after cardiac death (DCD). The effect of this policy on cold ischemia time (CIT), delayed graft function (DGF), and transplant survival was assessed.
RESULTS: Mean CIT was 16.7 hr with a prospective XM and 14.3 hr when it was omitted (P<0.001). The beneficial effect of omitting the XM on DGF was only apparent in recipients of DBD kidneys, where the DGF rate was 28% with a prospective XM and 18% without a prospective XM (P=0.03). The corresponding DGF rate in recipients of DCD kidneys was 52% with a prospective XM and 54% without a prospective XM. Logistic regression analysis, after adjustment for variables that influenced DGF, showed that the odds on suffering DGF were lower when the pretransplant XM test was omitted (P=0.04). Neither acute rejection rate nor long-term graft survival was influenced by omission of the XM.
CONCLUSION: Rigorous recording of potential allosensitizing events and comprehensive antibody screening allows the XM to be safely omitted in selected patients and this helps limit CIT and may reduce DGF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20098281     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181c926f2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  5 in total

Review 1.  Utility of HLA Antibody Testing in Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Ana Konvalinka; Kathryn Tinckam
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 2.  BSHI/BTS guidance on crossmatching before deceased donor kidney transplantation.

Authors:  S Peacock; D Briggs; M Barnardo; R Battle; P Brookes; C Callaghan; B Clark; C Collins; S Day; N Diaz Burlinson; P Dunn; R Fernando; S Fuggle; A Harmer; D Kallon; D Keegan; T Key; E Lawson; S Lloyd; J Martin; J McCaughan; D Middleton; F Partheniou; A Poles; T Rees; D Sage; E Santos-Nunez; O Shaw; M Willicombe; J Worthington
Journal:  Int J Immunogenet       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 2.385

Review 3.  Principles of Virtual Crossmatch Testing for Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Madhu C Bhaskaran; Sebastiaan Heidt; Thangamani Muthukumar
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2022-03-15

4.  Trends and impact on cold ischemia time and clinical outcomes using virtual crossmatch for deceased donor kidney transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Chethan M Puttarajappa; Dana Jorgensen; Jonathan G Yabes; Kwonho Jeong; Adriana Zeevi; John Lunz; Amit D Tevar; Michele Molinari; Sumit Mohan; Sundaram Hariharan
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 18.998

Review 5.  The Humoral Theory of Transplantation: Epitope Analysis and the Pathogenicity of HLA Antibodies.

Authors:  Edward J Filippone; John L Farber
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 4.818

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.