OBJECTIVE: EpCAM (CD326) is overexpressed in progenitor cells of endocrine pancreatic islands of Langerhans during fetal development and was suggested to act as a morphoregulatory molecule in pancreatic island ontogeny. We tested whether EpCAM overexpression is reactivated in insulinomas, endocrine tumors arising in the pancreas. DESIGN/ METHOD: We used monoclonal anti-EpCAM antibody Ber-Ep4 for immunohistochemistry on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor material. We analyzed 53 insulinomas: 40 benign (disease stage<IIa) and 13 malignant tumors (disease stage IIIb/IV). Disease stage disposition followed new TNM classification of the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) for foregut neuroendocrine tumors (2006). Additionally, ten insulinoma metastases were analyzed. Clinical follow-up was available for overall survival analysis from 49 patients. The EpCAM expression of the islands of Langerhans was classified as 2+ in healthy pancreatic tissue. RESULTS: In 38% of the benign insulinomas (disease stage<IIa), we found strong (3+) EpCAM expression. In contrast, malignant insulinomas (disease stage IIIb/IV) and their metastases exhibited a strong (3+) EpCAM expression with 78 and 80% respectively, significantly more frequent (P<0.01). The malignant tissue was characterized by a significantly lower number of unstained cells and significantly higher number of 3+ stained cells. Quantitative PCR for EpCAM mRNA validated strong EpCAM expression in malignant insulinoma. Kaplan-Meier curves indicated survival disadvantage for EpCAM 3+ insulinomas, but this was not statistically significant (log-rank test). CONCLUSION: This first EpCAM expression study in benign/malignant insulinomas indicates that strong EpCAM expression could help to identify patients at risk for malignant disease and might be used as a therapeutic target for antibody-based therapies in patients with metastatic insulinoma.
OBJECTIVE:EpCAM (CD326) is overexpressed in progenitor cells of endocrine pancreatic islands of Langerhans during fetal development and was suggested to act as a morphoregulatory molecule in pancreatic island ontogeny. We tested whether EpCAM overexpression is reactivated in insulinomas, endocrine tumors arising in the pancreas. DESIGN/ METHOD: We used monoclonal anti-EpCAM antibody Ber-Ep4 for immunohistochemistry on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor material. We analyzed 53 insulinomas: 40 benign (disease stage<IIa) and 13 malignant tumors (disease stage IIIb/IV). Disease stage disposition followed new TNM classification of the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) for foregut neuroendocrine tumors (2006). Additionally, ten insulinoma metastases were analyzed. Clinical follow-up was available for overall survival analysis from 49 patients. The EpCAM expression of the islands of Langerhans was classified as 2+ in healthy pancreatic tissue. RESULTS: In 38% of the benign insulinomas (disease stage<IIa), we found strong (3+) EpCAM expression. In contrast, malignant insulinomas (disease stage IIIb/IV) and their metastases exhibited a strong (3+) EpCAM expression with 78 and 80% respectively, significantly more frequent (P<0.01). The malignant tissue was characterized by a significantly lower number of unstained cells and significantly higher number of 3+ stained cells. Quantitative PCR for EpCAM mRNA validated strong EpCAM expression in malignant insulinoma. Kaplan-Meier curves indicated survival disadvantage for EpCAM 3+ insulinomas, but this was not statistically significant (log-rank test). CONCLUSION: This first EpCAM expression study in benign/malignant insulinomas indicates that strong EpCAM expression could help to identify patients at risk for malignant disease and might be used as a therapeutic target for antibody-based therapies in patients with metastatic insulinoma.
Authors: Ranju Ralhan; Helen C-H He; Anthony K-C So; Satyendra C Tripathi; Manish Kumar; Md Raghibul Hasan; Jatinder Kaur; Lawrence Kashat; Christina MacMillan; Shyam Singh Chauhan; Jeremy L Freeman; Paul G Walfish Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-11-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ranju Ralhan; Jun Cao; Terence Lim; Christina Macmillan; Jeremy L Freeman; Paul G Walfish Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2010-06-25 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Feride Kroepil; Georg Fluegen; Zaurbek Totikov; Stephan E Baldus; Christian Vay; Matthias Schauer; Stefan A Topp; Jan Schulte Am Esch; Wolfram T Knoefel; Nikolas H Stoecklein Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-09-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Brian D Hondowicz; Katharine V Schwedhelm; Arnold Kas; Michael A Tasch; Crystal Rawlings; Nirasha Ramchurren; Martin McIntosh; Leonard A D'Amico; Srinath Sanda; Nathan E Standifer; Jay Shendure; Brad Stone Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-01-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Feride Kroepil; Agnieszka Dulian; Daniel Vallböhmer; Helene Geddert; Andreas Krieg; Christian Vay; Stefan A Topp; Jan Schulte am Esch; Stephan E Baldus; Olivier Gires; Wolfram T Knoefel; Nikolas H Stoecklein Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2013-07-05
Authors: Michael Gock; Christina S Mullins; Christine Harnack; Friedrich Prall; Robert Ramer; Anja Göder; Oliver H Krämer; Ernst Klar; Michael Linnebacher Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2018-09-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Helen C-H He; Lawrence Kashat; Ipshita Kak; Tada Kunavisarut; Raefe Gundelach; Dae Kim; Anthony K-C So; Christina MacMillan; Jeremy L Freeman; Ranju Ralhan; Paul G Walfish Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-09-25 Impact factor: 3.240