Ciarán Bradley1, Jessica Weaver, Karen Brasel. 1. Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Critical Care Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA. cbradley@mcw.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Proactive case-finding using consultation triggers is a currently unexplored technique of increasing access to palliative care for patients in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU). METHODS: A retrospective, pre- and postintervention study examined the effect of an initiative involving palliative care consultation in a 21-bed SICU at an urban, tertiary referral center. The initiative identified patients meeting a set of consultation triggers suggested by a group of physicians with expertise in surgical palliative care. The charts of 300 patients were reviewed retrospectively before the initiative (Group I), and 344 charts were reviewed after the initiative (Group II) for the presence of a trigger and/or subsequent palliative care consultation. RESULTS: Triggers were rare in both groups (Group I, 5.7%; Group II, 5.5%). Palliative care consultations were also infrequent, without change before and after the intervention (Group I, 2.3%; Group II, 3.1%). There was no difference in consultations for patients meeting a trigger after the initiative (17.6% to 27.3%; P = .704). CONCLUSION: Implementation of triggers does not increase palliative care consultations in the SICU. As an isolated intervention, triggers occur in too few patients to improve overall access to palliative care, suggesting that other methods should be further explored. Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Proactive case-finding using consultation triggers is a currently unexplored technique of increasing access to palliative care for patients in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU). METHODS: A retrospective, pre- and postintervention study examined the effect of an initiative involving palliative care consultation in a 21-bed SICU at an urban, tertiary referral center. The initiative identified patients meeting a set of consultation triggers suggested by a group of physicians with expertise in surgical palliative care. The charts of 300 patients were reviewed retrospectively before the initiative (Group I), and 344 charts were reviewed after the initiative (Group II) for the presence of a trigger and/or subsequent palliative care consultation. RESULTS: Triggers were rare in both groups (Group I, 5.7%; Group II, 5.5%). Palliative care consultations were also infrequent, without change before and after the intervention (Group I, 2.3%; Group II, 3.1%). There was no difference in consultations for patients meeting a trigger after the initiative (17.6% to 27.3%; P = .704). CONCLUSION: Implementation of triggers does not increase palliative care consultations in the SICU. As an isolated intervention, triggers occur in too few patients to improve overall access to palliative care, suggesting that other methods should be further explored. Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Frank Z Zhao; Steven E Wolf; Paul A Nakonezny; Abu Minhajuddin; Ramona L Rhodes; M Elizabeth Paulk; Herb A Phelan Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Anne C Mosenthal; David E Weissman; J Randall Curtis; Ross M Hays; Dana R Lustbader; Colleen Mulkerin; Kathleen A Puntillo; Daniel E Ray; Rick Bassett; Renee D Boss; Karen J Brasel; Margaret Campbell; Judith E Nelson Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Katherine F Ernst; Daniel E Hall; Kendra K Schmid; Georgia Seever; Pierre Lavedan; Thomas G Lynch; Jason Michael Johanning Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Michael D Adolph; Kimberly A Frier; Stanislaw Pa Stawicki; Anthony T Gerlach; Thomas J Papadimos Journal: Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci Date: 2011-07