Literature DB >> 20097371

Combined buccal and lingual mucosa grafts for urethroplasty: an experimental study in dogs.

Xiaoyong Hu1, Yuemin Xu, Lujie Song, Huizhen Zhang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate combined buccal mucosa and lingual mucosa grafts for urethroplasty in a dog model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven female mongrel dogs were randomly selected. After a segment of proximal urethra mucosa (4 cm × 1cm) was excised and onlayed urethroplasty was performed using the combined free buccal mucosa (2 cm × 1cm) graft harvested from the inferior cheek and free lingual mucosa graft (2 cm × 1cm) harvested from the inferior lateral surface of the tongue. A 12F urethral catheter was kept inside the urethra for a mean of 7 d. Retrograde urethrography was done and urethra diameter was calibrated with a 10Fr catheter before animals were sacrificed at wk 12. After sacrifice of all dogs, the grafted areas excised and evaluated by gross and histopathological examination.
RESULTS: All dogs survived the procedure and there were no tongue and oral complications. One of the seven dogs developed a severe urethral stricture near the proximal anastomosis. The remaining six dogs voided spontaneously with no difficulty. Retrograde urethrography showed that no strictures or fistulas had formed. The combined buccal mucosa graft and lingual mucosa graft shortened by 10.2% after surgery, from a mean (SD) of 4 (0.15) to 3.59 (0.23) cm (statistical significance, P < 0.05). No stricture was found in the connection of the buccal mucosa and lingual mucosa grafts. Histologic examination showed that the combined buccal mucosa and lingual mucosa grafts were well-incorporated into the urethral walls and covered by a keratinized squamous epithelium.
CONCLUSIONS: We successfully developed a dog model for combined buccal mucosa graft and lingual mucosa graft and showed the feasibility of this approach for urethral substitution.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20097371     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.10.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  7 in total

1.  Histopathological changes in oral mucosa in cases of failed augmented urethroplasty.

Authors:  Rohit Bhattar; Sher S Yadav; Vinay Tomar
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-02-05

2.  Internal urethrotomy in patients with recurrent urethral stricture after buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty.

Authors:  Clemens M Rosenbaum; Marianne Schmid; Tim A Ludwig; Luis A Kluth; Philip Reiss; Roland Dahlem; Oliver Engel; Felix K-H Chun; Silke Riechardt; Margit Fisch; Sascha A Ahyai
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Objective assessment of mouth opening after buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty: A prospective study.

Authors:  Kaushal Patel; Jaisukh Kalathia; Venkatesh Krishnamoorthy
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2020-07-17

4.  Comparison of two different methods of establishment of canine urethroplasty model: an experimental trial.

Authors:  Jianpo Zhai; Danhui Zhao; Guanglin Huang; Libo Man; Guoqiang Yan; Chengai Wu
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Three new experimental models of anterior urethral stricture in rabbits.

Authors:  Hai-Jun Yao; Zi-Wei Wei; Xiang Wan; Yu-Cheng Tao; Da-Chao Zheng; Zhong Wang; Min-Kai Xie
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2022-06

6.  One-stage dorsal lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty for the treatment of failed hypospadias repair.

Authors:  Hong-Bin Li; Yue-Min Xu; Qiang Fu; Ying-Long Sa; Jiong Zhang; Hong Xie
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Urethral Tissue Reconstruction Using the Acellular Dermal Matrix Patch Modified with Collagen-Binding VEGF in Beagle Urethral Injury Models.

Authors:  Yanni Wang; Guannan Wang; Xianglin Hou; Yannan Zhao; Bing Chen; Jianwu Dai; Ning Sun
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.