Literature DB >> 20095915

Safety and efficacy of single-day GemOx regimen in patients with pancreatobiliary cancer: a single institution experience.

Jia Li1, Manyee Merl, Mike X Lee, Kristin Kaley, Muhammad W Saif.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: GemOx (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) > 100 min on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 2 every 2 weeks) achieved a response rate of 26.8%, improved progression-free survival (PFS) but failed to demonstrate a benefit in overall survival (OS) compared with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer. This regimen has regained attention after recent pooled- and meta-analysis suggested a survival benefit of gemcitabine-platinum doublets over gemcitabine. However, GemOx is associated with inconvenience to patients, early cumulative dose developing neuropathy and thrombocytopenia. In addition, fixed dose rate of gemcitabine showed no benefit > 30 min infusion schedule in the ECOG6201 study. Pharmacokinetic profiles of both drugs did not show statistically significant difference regardless of the order of administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In order to create a more convenient and equally effective regimen, we conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-day modified GemOx (S-GemOx, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) > 30 min and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) > 2 h on day 1 every 2 weeks) in patients with pancreatic and biliary cancers.
RESULTS: In all, 34 patients (median age 60 years, male/female: 17/17) received S-GemOx including locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (26) and biliary duct carcinoma (8). Median treatment was six cycles with duration of 12 weeks (range (r): 2 - 56). Median cumulative dose of oxaliplatin was 517.5 mg/m(2) (r: 85 - 2380). A total of 27 of 34 patients were evaluated for efficacy after initial staging: 1 (3.7%) complete response (CR), 4 (14.8%) partial response (PR), 18 (66.7%) stable disease and 4 (14.8%) progression of disease. Overall response rate (CR + PR) was 18.5%. Median PFS and OS were 7 and 11.6 months, respectively. All patients were assessed for toxicities. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities include anemia (8%), neutropenia (11%), thrombocytopenia (5%), nausea/vomiting (3%), diarrhea (3%), hypersensitivity reaction (14%) and neuropathy (3%). No deaths occurred due to therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: S-GemOx regimen provides convenient schedule, toxicities appear to be comparable with GemOx. The incidence of neuropathy (3 vs 19.1%) and thrombocytopenia (5 vs 14%) are substantially lower compared with GemOx. Prospective studies of S-GemOx in a large patient population are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20095915     DOI: 10.1517/14740330903555181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf        ISSN: 1474-0338            Impact factor:   4.250


  6 in total

Review 1.  The role of radiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Ruchika Gutt; Stanley L Liauw; Ralph R Weichselbaum
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Simplified/Same Day(s)-GOLF as First-line Treatment of Metastatic Carcinoma of Unknown Primary (CUP), Suggestive of Pancreatobiliary Tumors.

Authors:  Muhammad Wasif Saif; Komal Wasif; Martin D Goodman; Sanjay Hegde; Mark Sterling; Robert Yacavone; Sunny Jaiswal; Barbara Weinstein; Kevin Daly; Valerie Relias
Journal:  JOP       Date:  2019-11

3.  Use of zebrafish embryos as avatar of patients with pancreatic cancer: A new xenotransplantation model towards personalized medicine.

Authors:  Gregorio Di Franco; Alice Usai; Niccola Funel; Matteo Palmeri; Ida Elena Rosamaria Montesanti; Matteo Bianchini; Desirée Gianardi; Niccolò Furbetta; Simone Guadagni; Enrico Vasile; Alfredo Falcone; Luca Emanuele Pollina; Vittoria Raffa; Luca Morelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  A Retrospective Case Series Of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) In Combination With Gemcitabine And Oxaliplatin (Gemox) On Treating Elderly Middle And Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Shuang-Fen Tao; Wen-Hua Gu; Jian-Chun Gu; Mei-Ling Zhu; Qing Wang; Lei-Zhen Zheng
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  The travails of therapeutic modifications in cancer care amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: Future directions and lessons learned.

Authors:  Talal Almas; Muhammad Hassan Naeem Goraya; Zahid Ijaz Tarar; Tarek Khedro; Maryam Ehtesham; Uzair Malik; Abdulla Hussain Al-Awaid; Muhammad Ali Niaz; Lamees Alshaikh; Ali Rifai
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-05-29

6.  Selecting lncRNAs in gastric cancer cells for directed therapy with bioactive peptides and chemotherapy drugs.

Authors:  Wenyan Han; Rui Xiao; Chuanling Zhang; Qimuge Suyila; Xian Li; Xiulan Su
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-09-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.