Literature DB >> 20095780

Comparisons of examination performance between 'conventional' and Graduate Entry Programme students; the Newcastle experience.

Richard Price1, Sarah Robin Wright.   

Abstract

Knowledge assessment outcomes were compared between and across students on our Graduate Entry to Medicine (GEP) course at Newcastle (UK) and the conventional 5-year programme. Results show that Newcastle GEP students perform significantly better in these assessments than both 5-year programme students, and graduate students on the 5-year programme. There is no significant difference in these assessment scores between GEP students from different previous educational backgrounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20095780     DOI: 10.3109/01421590903196961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  3 in total

1.  Comparative attainment of 5-year undergraduate and 4-year graduate entry medical students moving into foundation training.

Authors:  Gillian Manning; Paul Garrud
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 2.463

2.  Impact of accelerated, graduate-entry medicine courses: a comparison of profile, success, and specialty destination between graduate entrants to accelerated or standard medicine courses in UK.

Authors:  Paul Garrud; I C McManus
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Profiling strugglers in a graduate-entry medicine course at Nottingham: a retrospective case study.

Authors:  Paul Garrud; Janet Yates
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 2.463

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.