Literature DB >> 20095273

Influence of volumes of prostate, rectum, and bladder on treatment planning CT on interfraction prostate shifts during ultrasound image-guided IMRT.

Nandanuri M S Reddy1, Dattatreyudu Nori, William Sartin, Samuel Maiorano, Jennifer Modena, Andrej Mazur, Adrian Osian, Brijmohan Sood, Akkamma Ravi, Seshadri Sampath, Christopher S Lange.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between prostate, bladder, and rectum volumes on treatment planning CT day and prostate shifts in the XYZ directions on treatment days.
METHODS: Prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, and rectum were contoured on CT images obtained in supine position. Intensity modulated radiation therapy plans was prepared. Contours were exported to BAT-ultrasound imaging system. Patients were positioned on the couch using skin marks. An ultrasound probe was used to obtain ultrasound images of prostate, bladder, and rectum, which were aligned with CT images. Couch shifts in the XYZ directions as recommended by BAT system were made and recorded. 4698 couch shifts for 42 patients were analyzed to study the correlations between interfraction prostate shifts vs bladder, rectum, and prostate volumes on planning CT.
RESULTS: Mean and range of volumes (cc): Bladder: 179 (42-582), rectum: 108 (28-223), and prostate: 55 (21-154). Mean systematic prostate shifts were (cm, +/-SD) right and left lateral: -0.047 +/- 0.16 (-0.361-0.251), anterior and posterior: 0.14 0.3 (-0.466-0.669), and superior and inferior: 0.19 +/- 0.26 (-0.342-0.633). Bladder volume was not correlated with lateral, anterior/posterior, and superior/inferior prostate shifts (P > 0.2). Rectal volume was correlated with anterior/posterior (P < 0.001) but not with lateral and superior/inferior prostate shifts (P > 0.2). The smaller the rectal volume or cross sectional area, the larger was the prostate shift anteriorly and vice versa (P < 0.001). Prostate volume was correlated with superior/inferior (P < 0.05) but not with lateral and anterior/posterior prostate shifts (P > 0.2). The smaller the prostate volume, the larger was prostate shift superiorly and vice versa (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Prostate and rectal volumes, but not bladder volumes, on treatment planning CT influenced prostate position on treatment fractions. Daily image-guided adoptive radiotherapy would be required for patients with distended or empty rectum on planning CT to reduce rectal toxicity in the case of empty rectum and to minimize geometric miss of prostate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20095273     DOI: 10.1118/1.3260840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of MRI visualization between linearly placed iron-containing and non-iron-containing fiducial markers for prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  Osamu Tanaka; Hisao Komeda; Masayoshi Tamaki; Kensaku Seike; Shota Fujimoto; Eiichi Yama; Shigeki Hirose; Masayuki Matsuo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of interfractional anatomical variations on prostate proton therapy using daily in-room CT images.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Jason A Efstathiou; Gregory C Sharp; Hsiao-Ming Lu; I Frank Ciernik; Alexei V Trofimov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Randomized clinical trial of postoperative strontium-90 radiation therapy for pterygia: treatment using 30 Gy/3 fractions vs. 40 Gy/4 fractions.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Nakamatsu; Yasumasa Nishimura; Shuichi Kanamori; Ryuta Koike; Izumi Tachibana; Tatsuyuki Nishikawa; Toru Shibata
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Semi-automated prediction approach of target shifts using machine learning with anatomical features between planning and pretreatment CT images in prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yudai Kai; Hidetaka Arimura; Kenta Ninomiya; Tetsuo Saito; Yoshinobu Shimohigashi; Akiko Kuraoka; Masato Maruyama; Ryo Toya; Natsuo Oya
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  High-performance GPU-based rendering for real-time, rigid 2D/3D-image registration and motion prediction in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Jakob Spoerk; Christelle Gendrin; Christoph Weber; Michael Figl; Supriyanto Ardjo Pawiro; Hugo Furtado; Daniella Fabri; Christoph Bloch; Helmar Bergmann; Eduard Gröller; Wolfgang Birkfellner
Journal:  Z Med Phys       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 4.820

Review 6.  Immune responses against protozoan parasites: a focus on the emerging role of Nod-like receptors.

Authors:  Prajwal Gurung; Thirumala-Devi Kanneganti
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Impact of bladder volume on acute genitourinary toxicity in intensity modulated radiotherapy for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Arne Grün; Michael Kawgan-Kagan; David Kaul; Harun Badakhshi; Carmen Stromberger; Volker Budach; Dirk Böhmer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Analysis of inter-fraction setup errors and organ motion by daily kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography in intensity modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marcella Palombarini; Stefano Mengoli; Paola Fantazzini; Cecilia Cadioli; Claudio Degli Esposti; Giovanni Piero Frezza
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Strategies to evaluate the impact of rectal volume on prostate motion during three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ana Paula Diniz Fortuna Poli; Rodrigo Souza Dias; Adelmo José Giordani; Helena Regina Comodo Segreto; Roberto Araujo Segreto
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

10.  Correlation between patients' anatomical characteristics and interfractional internal prostate motion during intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shintaroh Maruoka; Yasuo Yoshioka; Fumiaki Isohashi; Osamu Suzuki; Yuji Seo; Yuki Otani; Yuichi Akino; Yutaka Takahashi; Iori Sumida; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-10-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.