Literature DB >> 2009523

Phase I pharmacokinetic study of intraperitoneal etoposide.

P J O'Dwyer1, F P LaCreta, J P Daugherty, M Hogan, N G Rosenblum, J L O'Dwyer, R L Comis.   

Abstract

The synergistic interaction of etoposide with cisplatin in certain tumors prompted an evaluation of its potential role in the i.p. treatment of ovarian cancer and other intraabdominal malignancies. We conducted a Phase I evaluation of etoposide as a single agent to determine the maximum tolerated dose i.p., to describe dose-limiting and other toxic effects, and to examine the pharmacokinetics of etoposide in this setting. Etoposide was diluted in 2 liters of normal saline, and instilled i.p. over 10 to 25 min following maximal drainage of ascites. The dwelling time was 4 h, followed by peritoneal drainage. Twenty-two patients received 56 courses at doses which ranged from 100 to 800 mg/m2. The median age was 49, the median performance status was 1, and 18 patients had received prior chemotherapy, with or without radiation. The principal acute toxicity was abdominal pain in 10 patients; this was usually accompanied by signs of peritoneal irritation and was always responsive to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medications. The major toxicity was dose-related neutropenia; Grade 3 or 4 toxicity affected five of six patients at 800 mg/m2. Thrombocytopenia, nausea and vomiting, and alopecia were also observed. The recommended dose for further study is 700 mg/m2. The pharmacokinetics of etoposide in plasma and peritoneal fluid was measured in 19 patients. Peritoneal levels over the 4-h dwelling time declined monoexponentially with a harmonic mean half-life of 3.5 h (range, 1.9 to 7.8). Plasma levels rose to a peak at 2.9 +/- 1.7 (SD) h and then declined exponentially with a harmonic mean terminal half-life of 7.7 h (range, 4.2 to 15.6). The plasma area under the concentration-time curve increased linearly with respect to dose. The relative pharmacological advantage (ratio of peritoneal to plasma area under concentration-time curve) for i.p. administration was measured as 2.8 and was independent of dose. Based on the high plasma protein binding of etoposide (94%) and the minimal protein binding in the fluid instilled i.p., the ratio of the areas under the concentration-time curves of free drug is estimated to be 4%. These results illustrate that tumor confined to the peritoneal cavity would be exposed to substantially higher free (diffusible) drug concentrations following i.p. than following i.v. administration and support the further evaluation of etoposide by this route.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2009523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  10 in total

1.  Etoposide sensitizes CT26 colorectal adenocarcinoma to radiation therapy in BALB/c mice.

Authors:  Chia-Yuan Liu; Hui-Fen Liao; Tsang-En Wang; Shee-Chan Lin; Shou-Chuan Shih; Wen-Hsuing Chang; Yuh-Cheng Yang; Ching-Chung Lin; Yu-Jen Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Intraperitoneal therapy for peritoneal cancer.

Authors:  Ze Lu; Jie Wang; M Guillaume Wientjes; Jessie L-S Au
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.404

3.  Tumor-penetrating microparticles for intraperitoneal therapy of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ze Lu; Max Tsai; Dan Lu; Jie Wang; M Guillaume Wientjes; Jessie L-S Au
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  "Atypical" multidrug resistance in human ovarian cancer cell line A2780 selected for resistance to doxorubicin (A2780 DX3).

Authors:  G Cimoli; M Valenti; E Noviello; S Parodi; A Mazzoni; E Rovini; F De Sessa; P Russo
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Phase 2 trial of chronic low-dose oral etoposide as salvage therapy of platinum-refractory ovarian cancer.

Authors:  M Markman; T Hakes; B Reichman; J Curtin; R Barakat; S Rubin; W Jones; J L Lewis; L Almadrones; W Hoskins
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 6.  Use of etoposide in patients with organ dysfunction: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations.

Authors:  C F Stewart
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Intraperitoneal cisplatin and etoposide in peritoneal mesothelioma: favorable outcome with a multimodality approach.

Authors:  C J Langer; N Rosenblum; M Hogan; S Nash; P Bagchi; F P LaCreta; R Catalano; R L Comis; P J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 8.  Therapeutic strategies based on polymeric microparticles.

Authors:  C Vilos; L A Velasquez
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2012-05-16

9.  A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of intraperitoneal carboplatin and etoposide.

Authors:  E F McClay; R Goel; P Andrews; S Gorelick; S Kirmani; S Kim; P Braly; S Plaxe; S Hoff; J Alcaraz
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Potentiation of topoisomerase I and II inhibitors cell killing by tumor necrosis factor: relationship to DNA strand breakage formation.

Authors:  G Orengo; E Noviello; G Cimoli; G Pagnan; S Parodi; M Venturini; P Conte; F Schenone; G Conzi; P Russo
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1992-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.