PURPOSE: To assess the pharmacokinetics and evaluate potential drug-drug interactions between erlotinib, paclitaxel and carboplatin. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:1,079 previously untreated patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled and randomized in a phase III trial (TRIBUTE) to receive either erlotinib or placebo in combination with paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV over 3 h and carboplatin at a calculated dose to achieve an AUC 6 mg∙min/mL. To determine possible drug-drug interaction with this combination, a subset of 24 (12 erlotinib, 12 placebo) patients were enrolled onto an intensive pharmacokinetic (IPK) substudy group at a single site. All IPK patients received either erlotinib 150 mg/day or placebo-controlled tablets. Analyses were completed using validated analytical methodologies. Non-compartmental modeling was utilized to estimate PK parameters. RESULTS: Complete blood sampling for pharmacokinetic analysis was obtained in 21 of 24 patients. Mean AUC(0-τ) for erlotinib and the OSI-420 metabolite were 29,997 ng∙h/mL and 3,020 ng∙h/mL, respectively. Mean (SD) paclitaxel clearances (L/h/M(2)) were 11.7 (3.4) and 12.7 (6.7) in the placebo and erlotinib treatment groups, respectively. The resultant paclitaxel AUC(0-∞) (ng∙h/mL) was 18,400 (5,300) for the placebo group and 17,800 (5,500) for the erlotinib group. For carboplatin, the mean (SD) clearances (L/h) were 16.8 (3.9) and 16.1 (4.4) for the placebo and erlotinib groups, respectively. The resultant carboplatin AUC(0-∞) (ng/mL∙h) were 49,900 (9,700) for the placebogroup and 48,400 (11,900) for the erlotinib group. No significant differences were observed in these paclitaxel or carboplatin pharmacokinetic group comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of erlotinib to a standard chemotherapy regimen for NSCLC did not alter the systemic exposures (AUC(0-∞)) of paclitaxel (p = 0.80) and carboplatin (p = 0.756) when erlotinib-treated patients were compared to placebo-treated patients. The pharmacokinetics of erlotinib and its metabolite OSI-420 did not appear to be altered by the concomitant administration of paclitaxel and carboplatin.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To assess the pharmacokinetics and evaluate potential drug-drug interactions between erlotinib, paclitaxel and carboplatin. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: 1,079 previously untreated patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled and randomized in a phase III trial (TRIBUTE) to receive either erlotinib or placebo in combination with paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV over 3 h and carboplatin at a calculated dose to achieve an AUC 6 mg∙min/mL. To determine possible drug-drug interaction with this combination, a subset of 24 (12 erlotinib, 12 placebo) patients were enrolled onto an intensive pharmacokinetic (IPK) substudy group at a single site. All IPK patients received either erlotinib 150 mg/day or placebo-controlled tablets. Analyses were completed using validated analytical methodologies. Non-compartmental modeling was utilized to estimate PK parameters. RESULTS: Complete blood sampling for pharmacokinetic analysis was obtained in 21 of 24 patients. Mean AUC(0-τ) for erlotinib and the OSI-420 metabolite were 29,997 ng∙h/mL and 3,020 ng∙h/mL, respectively. Mean (SD) paclitaxel clearances (L/h/M(2)) were 11.7 (3.4) and 12.7 (6.7) in the placebo and erlotinib treatment groups, respectively. The resultant paclitaxel AUC(0-∞) (ng∙h/mL) was 18,400 (5,300) for the placebo group and 17,800 (5,500) for the erlotinib group. For carboplatin, the mean (SD) clearances (L/h) were 16.8 (3.9) and 16.1 (4.4) for the placebo and erlotinib groups, respectively. The resultant carboplatin AUC(0-∞) (ng/mL∙h) were 49,900 (9,700) for the placebo group and 48,400 (11,900) for the erlotinib group. No significant differences were observed in these paclitaxel or carboplatin pharmacokinetic group comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of erlotinib to a standard chemotherapy regimen for NSCLC did not alter the systemic exposures (AUC(0-∞)) of paclitaxel (p = 0.80) and carboplatin (p = 0.756) when erlotinib-treated patients were compared to placebo-treated patients. The pharmacokinetics of erlotinib and its metabolite OSI-420 did not appear to be altered by the concomitant administration of paclitaxel and carboplatin.
Authors: M Hidalgo; L L Siu; J Nemunaitis; J Rizzo; L A Hammond; C Takimoto; S G Eckhardt; A Tolcher; C D Britten; L Denis; K Ferrante; D D Von Hoff; S Silberman; E K Rowinsky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Roy S Herbst; Diane Prager; Robert Hermann; Lou Fehrenbacher; Bruce E Johnson; Alan Sandler; Mark G Kris; Hai T Tran; Pam Klein; Xin Li; David Ramies; David H Johnson; Vincent A Miller Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-07-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Frances A Shepherd; José Rodrigues Pereira; Tudor Ciuleanu; Eng Huat Tan; Vera Hirsh; Sumitra Thongprasert; Daniel Campos; Savitree Maoleekoonpiroj; Michael Smylie; Renato Martins; Maximiliano van Kooten; Mircea Dediu; Brian Findlay; Dongsheng Tu; Dianne Johnston; Andrea Bezjak; Gary Clark; Pedro Santabárbara; Lesley Seymour Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-07-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Amita Patnaik; Debra Wood; Anthony W Tolcher; Marta Hamilton; Jeffrey I Kreisberg; Lisa A Hammond; Garry Schwartz; Muralidhar Beeram; Manuel Hidalgo; Monica M Mita; Julie Wolf; Paul Nadler; Eric K Rowinsky Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-12-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: V A Pollack; D M Savage; D A Baker; K E Tsaparikos; D E Sloan; J D Moyer; E G Barbacci; L R Pustilnik; T A Smolarek; J A Davis; M P Vaidya; L D Arnold; J L Doty; K K Iwata; M J Morin Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Jie Ling; Kim A Johnson; Zhuang Miao; Ashok Rakhit; Michael P Pantze; Marta Hamilton; Bert L Lum; Chandra Prakash Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2005-12-28 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Malcolm J Moore; David Goldstein; John Hamm; Arie Figer; Joel R Hecht; Steven Gallinger; Heather J Au; Pawel Murawa; David Walde; Robert A Wolff; Daniel Campos; Robert Lim; Keyue Ding; Gary Clark; Theodora Voskoglou-Nomikos; Mieke Ptasynski; Wendy Parulekar Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-04-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Denis Soulieres; Neil N Senzer; Everett E Vokes; Manuel Hidalgo; Sanjiv S Agarwala; Lillian L Siu Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ulrich Gatzemeier; Anna Pluzanska; Aleksandra Szczesna; Eckhard Kaukel; Jaromir Roubec; Flavio De Rosa; Janusz Milanowski; Hanna Karnicka-Mlodkowski; Milos Pesek; Piotr Serwatowski; Rodryg Ramlau; Terezie Janaskova; Johan Vansteenkiste; Janos Strausz; Georgy Moiseevich Manikhas; Joachim Von Pawel Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-04-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Brian Higgins; Kenneth Kolinsky; Melissa Smith; Gordon Beck; Mohammad Rashed; Violeta Adames; Michael Linn; Eric Wheeldon; Laurent Gand; Herbert Birnboeck; Gerhard Hoffmann Journal: Anticancer Drugs Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 2.248
Authors: Angela DeMichele; Donald A Berry; JoAnne Zujewski; Sally Hunsberger; Larry Rubinstein; Joseph E Tomaszewski; Gary Kelloff; Jane Perlmutter; Meredith Buxton; Julia Lyandres; Kathy S Albain; Chris Benz; A Jo Chien; Paul Haluska; Brian Leyland-Jones; Minetta C Liu; Pamela Munster; Olufunmilayo Olopade; John W Park; Barbara A Parker; Lajos Pusztai; Debu Tripathy; Hope Rugo; Douglas Yee; Laura Esserman Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Xin Zhang; Sudhir Raghavan; Michael Ihnat; Jessica E Thorpe; Bryan C Disch; Anja Bastian; Lora C Bailey-Downs; Nicholas F Dybdal-Hargreaves; Cristina C Rohena; Ernest Hamel; Susan L Mooberry; Aleem Gangjee Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2014-05-14 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Sami Sebastian Khaznadar; Martin Khan; Elke Schmid; Sebastian Gebhart; Eva-Tessina Becker; Thomas Krahn; Oliver von Ahsen Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2018-06-22