Literature DB >> 20094732

Disjunct performance and distribution in the sedge Carex prasina.

Kathryn M Flinn1, Marcia J Waterway, Martin J Lechowicz.   

Abstract

Efforts to understand species distributions and predict responses to environmental changes depend on specifying how the abiotic environment determines distributions. At landscape scales, it is critical to distinguish effects of environmental factors from other mechanisms such as competition and dispersal limitation. We examined how environmental factors affect the distribution and performance of the sedge Carex prasina across a 10-km(2) old-growth forest in southern Québec. We isolated the effects of soil characteristics by conducting a greenhouse experiment that assessed the performance of C. prasina on soils from a range of wetland habitats where it could potentially occur. This allowed us to compare how the species' performance and its distribution across the landscape relate to the same soil characteristics. In the experiment, the biomass and leaf chlorophyll content of C. prasina increased with increasing soil organic matter (OM). Across the landscape, however, the species' probability of occurrence and abundance decreased with increasing soil OM. C. prasina had similar biomass on soils from sites where it did and did not occur, but it had higher leaf chlorophyll content on soils from sites where it did not occur. We found no evidence that differential performance across environments determines the distribution of this species, as C. prasina tended to occur on soils where it showed reduced performance. Rather, other processes such as competition or dispersal limitation likely override any direct effects of the soil environment on distribution. Our results caution against the common assumption that the environments where a species tends to occur or be most abundant are the environments where it performs best. C. prasina presents a clear example of a species whose performance, at least along edaphic gradients, cannot explain its distribution. This example highlights the importance of distinguishing the relative roles of biotic and abiotic factors that shape species distributions across landscapes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20094732     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-010-1563-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Neutrality, niches, and dispersal in a temperate forest understory.

Authors:  Benjamin Gilbert; Martin J Lechowicz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Community patterns in source-sink metacommunities.

Authors:  Nicolas Mouquet; Michel Loreau
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Determinants of species richness in the Park Grass Experiment.

Authors:  M J Crawley; A E Johnston; J Silvertown; M Dodd; C de Mazancourt; M S Heard; D F Henman; G R Edwards
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-01-10       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Propagule vs. niche limitation: untangling the mechanisms behind plant species' distributions.

Authors:  Kara A Moore; Sarah C Elmendorf
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Dispersal limitation and environmental heterogeneity shape scale-dependent diversity patterns in plant communities.

Authors:  Amy L Freestone; Brian D Inouye
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  Plant species diversity and composition of wetlands within an upland forest.

Authors:  Kathryn M Flinn; Martin J Lechowicz; Marcia J Waterway
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.844

7.  Experimental verification of ecological niche modeling in a heterogeneous environment.

Authors:  Jessica W Wright; Kendi F Davies; Jennifer A Lau; Andrew C McCall; John K McKay
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.499

8.  Germination and establishment of forest sedges (Carex, Cyperaceae): tests for home-site advantage and effects of leaf litter.

Authors:  M Vellend; M J Lechowicz; M J Waterway
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.844

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.