Literature DB >> 20093422

Clinical outcomes after microfracture of the glenohumeral joint.

Rachel M Frank1, Geoffrey S Van Thiel, Mark A Slabaugh, Anthony A Romeo, Brian J Cole, Nikhil N Verma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microfracture is an effective surgical treatment for isolated, full-thickness cartilage defects with current data focused on applications in the knee. No studies describing clinical outcomes of patients who have undergone microfracture in the shoulder joint have been reported. HYPOTHESIS: Treatment of glenohumeral joint articular defects using microfracture would demonstrate similar short-term clinical outcomes when compared with other joints. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: From March 2001 to August 2007, 16 patients (17 shoulders) who underwent arthroscopic microfracture of the humeral head and/or glenoid surface were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were examined by an independent, blinded examiner and completed surveys containing the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES), and visual analog scale (VAS).
RESULTS: Two patients were lost to follow-up, for a follow-up rate of 88%. Three patients went on to subsequent shoulder surgery and were considered to have failed results. The mean age was 37.0 years (range, 18-55 years) with an average follow-up of 27.8 months (range, 12.1-89.2 months). The average size of humeral and glenoid defects was 5.07 cm(2) (range, 1.0-7.84 cm(2)) and 1.66 cm(2) (range, 0.4-3.75 cm(2)), respectively. There was a statistically significant decrease from 5.6 +/- 1.7 to 1.9 +/- 1.4 (P < .01) in VAS after surgery as well as statistically significant improvements (P < .01) in SST (5.7 +/- 2.1 to 10.3 +/- 1.3) and ASES (44.3 +/- 15.3 to 86.3 +/- 10.5). Twelve (92.3%) patients claimed they would have the procedure again.
CONCLUSION: Microfracture of the glenohumeral joint provides a significant improvement in pain relief and shoulder function in patients with isolated, full-thickness chondral injuries. Longer term studies are required to determine if similar results are maintained over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20093422     DOI: 10.1177/0363546509350304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  24 in total

1.  Arthroscopic partial shoulder resurfacing.

Authors:  Werner Anderl; Bernhard Kriegleder; Manfred Neumaier; Brenda Laky; Philipp Heuberer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  [Posttraumatic arthrosis of the glenohumeral joint. From partial resurfacing to reverse shoulder arthroplasty].

Authors:  N Matis; R Ortmaier; P Moroder; H Resch; A Auffarth
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Management of cartilage defects in the shoulder.

Authors:  Anthony A Depalma; Konrad I Gruson
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-09

4.  Treatment of glenoid chondral defect using micronized allogeneic cartilage matrix implantation.

Authors:  Jason J Shin; Chris Mellano; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Rachel M Frank; Brian J Cole
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2014-08-18

5.  Osteochondral Autograft Transfer Technique for Glenoid Osteochondral Defect.

Authors:  Douglas J Wyland; Clint Beicker
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-08-29

6.  [Arthroscopic options for regenerative treatment of cartilage defects in the shoulder].

Authors:  I J Banke; S Vogt; S Buchmann; A B Imhoff
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Arthroscopic repair of a chondrolabral lesion associated with anterior glenohumeral dislocation.

Authors:  Richard Page; Deepak N Bhatia
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Assessment of glenoid chondral healing: comparison of microfracture to autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis in a novel rabbit shoulder model.

Authors:  Vincent M Wang; Vasili Karas; Andrew S Lee; Ziying Yin; Geoffrey S Van Thiel; Kristen Hussey; D Rick Sumner; Susan Chubinskaya; Richard L Magin; Nikhil N Verma; Anthony A Romeo; Brian J Cole
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 9.  [Shoulder cartilage regeneration : Indications, possibilities, surgical implementation].

Authors:  S Bouaicha
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 10.  Cell-based approaches to joint surface repair: a research perspective.

Authors:  A J Roelofs; J P J Rocke; C De Bari
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 6.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.