Literature DB >> 20093333

No clear clinical benefit of using mini-invasive extracorporeal circulation in coronary artery bypass grafting in low-risk patients.

Vladimir Svitek1, Vladimir Lonsky, Jiri Mandak, Jan Krejsek, Martina Kolackova, Vladimir Brzek, Jaroslav Kubicek, Martin Volt, Michael Bartos, Jan Harrer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current research is engaged in innovative technologies of extracorporeal circulation (ECC) systems in an effort to eliminate negative effects. Some studies have shown that, due to the complexity of technical settings of mini-ECC, they invoke a weaker immune response compared to classic ECC. The clinical benefits of using these systems have not been clearly proven yet.
METHODS: A group of 54 patients who were indicated for elective coronary surgery were randomised into two groups - Group A (patients operated on using classic ECC - open modification) and Group B (patients operated on using mini-ECC). The concentrations of IL-6, PMN elastase and MCP-1 in both groups were monitored per- and postoperatively, along with the postoperative clinical course.
RESULTS: The groups did not differ in the basic pre- and peroperative characteristics. We recorded a lower priming for mini-ECC (p < 0.001) and significantly reduced hemodilution during ECC. There were no differences in the clinical outcome in either group. Serum concentrations of monitored markers of immune reaction towards ECC showed higher activity during standard ECC.
CONCLUSION: New technologies used in mini-systems have proven to lower activation of the immune system, which can be monitored using kinetics of proinflammatory mediators. In spite of these comparable laboratory results, we did not find differences in short-term clinical results when comparing both these groups of low-risk patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20093333     DOI: 10.1177/0267659109359437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perfusion        ISSN: 0267-6591            Impact factor:   1.972


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of two technics of cardiopulmonary bypass (conventional and mini CPB) in the trans-and postoperative periods of cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Sergio Nunes Pereira; Izabelle Balta Zumba; Micheline Sulzbacher Batista; Daniela da Pieve; Elisandra dos Santos; Ralf Stuermer; Gerson Pereira de Oliveira; Roberta Senger
Journal:  Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

Review 2.  Mini cardiopulmonary bypass: Anesthetic considerations.

Authors:  Raed A Alsatli
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2012 Jan-Jun

3.  Conventional versus miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Timothy Cheng; Rajas Barve; Yeu Wah Michael Cheng; Andrew Ravendren; Amna Ahmed; Steven Toh; Christopher J Goulden; Amer Harky
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-10-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.