BACKGROUND: The present study determines the influence of sleeping position on central sleep apnea (CSA) in patients with heart failure (HF). METHODS: The apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) during different body positions while asleep was examined by cardiorespiratory polygraphy in 71 patients with HF (ejection fraction <45%). RESULTS: Twenty-five of the patients having predominantly CSA (central apnea index 10/h) with a lower obstructive apnea index (<5/h) were assigned to groups with positional (lateral to supine ratio of AHI <50%, n=12) or non-positional (ratio > or = 50%, n=13) CSA. In the non-positional group the BNP level was higher, the ejection fraction was lower and the trans-tricuspid pressure gradient was higher than in the positional group. Multiple regression analysis revealed more advanced age (p=0.006), log(10)BNP (p=0.017) and lung-to-finger circulation time (p=0.020) as independent factors of the degree of positional CSA. Intensive treatment for HF changed CSA from non-positional to positional in all eight patients tested. Single night of positional therapy reduced CSA (p<0.05) and BNP level (p=0.07) in seven positional patients. CONCLUSION: As cardiac dysfunction progresses, severity of CSA also increases and positional CSA becomes position-independent. Positional therapy could decrease CSA, thereby having a valuable effect on HF. 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: The present study determines the influence of sleeping position on central sleep apnea (CSA) in patients with heart failure (HF). METHODS: The apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) during different body positions while asleep was examined by cardiorespiratory polygraphy in 71 patients with HF (ejection fraction <45%). RESULTS: Twenty-five of the patients having predominantly CSA (central apnea index 10/h) with a lower obstructive apnea index (<5/h) were assigned to groups with positional (lateral to supine ratio of AHI <50%, n=12) or non-positional (ratio > or = 50%, n=13) CSA. In the non-positional group the BNP level was higher, the ejection fraction was lower and the trans-tricuspid pressure gradient was higher than in the positional group. Multiple regression analysis revealed more advanced age (p=0.006), log(10)BNP (p=0.017) and lung-to-finger circulation time (p=0.020) as independent factors of the degree of positional CSA. Intensive treatment for HF changed CSA from non-positional to positional in all eight patients tested. Single night of positional therapy reduced CSA (p<0.05) and BNP level (p=0.07) in seven positional patients. CONCLUSION: As cardiac dysfunction progresses, severity of CSA also increases and positional CSA becomes position-independent. Positional therapy could decrease CSA, thereby having a valuable effect on HF. 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors: R Nisha Aurora; Susmita Chowdhuri; Kannan Ramar; Sabin R Bista; Kenneth R Casey; Carin I Lamm; David A Kristo; Jorge M Mallea; James A Rowley; Rochelle S Zak; Sharon L Tracy Journal: Sleep Date: 2012-01-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Natascha Troester; Michael Palfner; Markus Dominco; Christoph Wohlkoenig; Erich Schmidberger; Martin Trinker; Alexander Avian Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-04-13 Impact factor: 3.240