Literature DB >> 20093051

Fenestrated endovascular grafting: the French multicentre experience.

S Amiot1, S Haulon, J-P Becquemin, P-E Magnan, P Lermusiaux, Y Goueffic, E Jean-Baptiste, F Cochennec, J-P Favre.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the medium-term outcomes following aortic aneurysm repair using fenestrated endografts performed in 16 French academic centres.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was carried out. This study included all patients treated with fenestrated endografts in France between May 2004 and January 2009. Patients were judged to be at high risk for open surgical repair. Fenestrated endografts were designed using computed tomography (CT) reconstructions performed on three-dimensional (3D) workstations. All patients were evaluated with CT, duplex ultrasound and plain film radiograph at discharge, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, and annually thereafter.
RESULTS: A total of 134 patients (129 males) were treated over the study period. Median age and aneurysm size were 73 years (range 48-91 years) and 56 mm (range 45-91 mm), respectively. A total of 403 visceral vessels were perfused through a fabric fenestration, including 265 renal arteries. One early conversion to open surgery was required. Completion angiography and discharge CT scan showed that 398/403 (99%) and 389/394 (99%) respective target vessels were patent. The 30-day mortality rate was 2% (3/134). Pre-discharge imaging identified 16 (12%) endoleaks: three type I, 12 type II and one type III. After the procedure, transient or permanent dialysis was required in four (3%) and two (1%) patients, respectively. The median duration of follow-up was 15 months (range 2-53 months). No aneurysms ruptured or required open conversion during the follow-up period. Twelve of 131 patients (9%) died during follow-up (actuarial survival at 12 and 24 months: 93% and 86%, respectively). Median time from procedure to death was 15 months. None of these deaths were aneurysm related. Aneurysm sac size decreased by more than 5 mm in 52%, 65.6% and 75% of patients at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. Three (4%) patients had sac enlargement within the first year, associated with a persistent endoleak. During follow-up, four renal artery occlusions were detected. A total of 12 procedure-related re-interventions were performed in 12 patients during follow-up, including six to correct endoleaks, and five to correct threatened visceral vessels.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of endovascular prostheses with graft material incorporating the visceral arteries is safe and effective in preventing rupture in the medium term. A predictable high mortality rate was depicted during follow-up in this high-risk cohort. Meticulous follow-up to assess sac behaviour and visceral ostia is critical to ensure optimal results. Copyright (c) 2009 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20093051     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  21 in total

Review 1.  Application of the Bolton Relay Device for Thoracic Endografting In or Near the Aortic Arch.

Authors:  Vincent Riambau
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2015-02-01

2.  Perioperative outcome of endovascular repair for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Klaas H J Ultee; Sara L Zettervall; Peter A Soden; Jeremy Darling; Hence J M Verhagen; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Predictive factors for mortality after open repair of paravisceral abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Prateek K Gupta; Jason N Mactaggart; Bala Natarajan; Thomas G Lynch; Shipra Arya; Himani Gupta; Xiang Fang; Iraklis I Pipinos
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  "More or less": management of type A aortic dissections in the endovascular era.

Authors:  Thodur M Vasudevan; Yogeesan Sivakumaran
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2022-03-11

Review 5.  The Current State of Fenestrated and Branched Devices for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

Authors:  Holly L Graves; Benjamin M Jackson
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 6.  Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Dominique B Buck; Joost A van Herwaarden; Marc L Schermerhorn; Frans L Moll
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 32.419

7.  Fenestrated endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  C Canning; Z Martin; M P Colgan; O Abdulrahim; M McCafferty; J Fitzpatrick; S N Haider; P Madhavan; S O'Neill
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Image guidance for endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional angiography and image fusion.

Authors:  Vania Tacher; MingDe Lin; Pascal Desgranges; Jean-Francois Deux; Thijs Grünhagen; Jean-Pierre Becquemin; Alain Luciani; Alain Rahmouni; Hicham Kobeiter
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 9.  Endovascular Treatment of Various Aortic Pathologies: Review of the Latest Data and Technologies.

Authors:  Koji Maeda; Takao Ohki; Yuji Kanaoka
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2018-05-07

10.  Early experience with fenestrated stent grafts for treatment of juxtarenal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Naoki Unno; Naoto Yamamoto; Wataru Higashiura; Minoru Suzuki; Yuuki Mano; Masaki Sano; Takaaki Saito; Ryota Sugisawa; Hiroyuki Konno
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2013-09-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.