Literature DB >> 20092840

Inflatable penile prosthesis implantation without corporeal dilation: a cavernous tissue sparing technique.

Ignacio Moncada1, Juan Ignacio Martínez-Salamanca, José Jara, Ramiro Cabello, Mercedes Moralejo, Carlos Hernández.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared the advantages and disadvantages of initial penile implantation with vs without prior dilation of the corpora cavernosa.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients implanted for the first time with a 700CX or an antibiotic coated 700CX InhibiZone 3-piece prosthesis by a single surgeon during January 2005 to December 2006 were included in the study. They were randomized to penile implantation without (group 1) or with (group 2) penile dilation. Postoperative pain was measured on the day after surgery and at day 7 postoperatively. Perioperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Residual erectile activity without prosthesis inflation was evaluated using the International Index of Erectile Function at 3-month intervals for 9 months. Patients recorded penile length and girth during maximum sexual stimulation during this time.
RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included in the study. Intraoperative complications occurred in 2 group 1 and 3 group 2 patients. Postoperatively complication rates and types were similar in the 2 groups. Pain was significantly greater in group 2 (p <0.01). Immediately postoperatively, and at 3 and 6 months penile length was significantly greater in group 1 than in group 2 (p <0.05). Mean International Index of Erectile Function scores were higher in group 1 (12, range 10 to 14 vs 7, range 6 to 8).
CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that penile dilation is not necessary in primary implantation cases. 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20092840     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  9 in total

Review 1.  Inflatable penile prosthesis cylinders out of place during implantation.

Authors:  Steven K Wilson; Jay Simhan; Rafael Carrion
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 2.896

2.  Streamlined approach for infrapubic placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis.

Authors:  Edward Karpman
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-05-28

3.  Management of end-stage erectile dysfunction and stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy by simultaneous dual implantation using a single trans-scrotal incision: surgical technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Juan I Martínez-Salamanca; Estefanía Linares Espinós; Ignacio Moncada; Luis Del Portillo; Joaquín Carballido
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 4.  Inflatable penile prosthesis in the radical prostatectomy patient: a review.

Authors:  Nelson Bennett; I-Shen Huang
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-06-19

Review 5.  Pain management strategies in penile implantation.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Ellis; Andrew M Higgins; Jay Simhan
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Penile Hemodynamic Response to Phosphodiesterase Type V Inhibitors after Cavernosal Sparing Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation: A Prospective Randomized Open-Blinded End-Point (PROBE) Study.

Authors:  Adham Zaazaa; Michaela Bayerle-Eder; Ramzy Elnabarawy; Mahmoud Elbitar; Taymour Mostafa
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2021-06-28

Review 7.  Lengthening strategies for Peyronie's disease.

Authors:  Christopher D Gaffney; Matthew J Pagano; Aaron C Weinberg; Alex C Small; Franklin E Kuehas; Paulo H Egydio; Robert J Valenzuela
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2016-06

Review 8.  Strategies for maintaining penile size following penile implant.

Authors:  King Chien Joe Lee; Gerald B Brock
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2013-03

9.  Comparison of the patient and partner satisfaction with 700CX and Titan penile prostheses.

Authors:  Javier Romero Otero; César Rojas Cruz; Borja García Gómez; Joaquim Sarquella Geli; Jose Medina Polo; Eduard Ruiz Castañé; Alfredo Rodríguez Antolín
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.