Literature DB >> 20092498

Political power beyond the State: problematics of government. 1992.

Nikolas Rose1, Peter Miller.   

Abstract

This paper sets out an approach to the analysis of political power in terms of problematics of government. It argues against an overvaluation of the 'problem of the State' in political debate and social theory. A number of conceptual tools are suggested for the analysis of the many and varied alliances between political and other authorities that seek to govern economic activity, social life and individual conduct. Modern political rationalities and governmental technologies are shown to be intrinsically linked to developments in knowledge and to the powers of expertise. The characteristics of liberal problematics of government are investigated, and it is argued that they are dependent upon technologies for 'governing at a distance', seeking to create locales, entities and persons able to operate a regulated autonomy. The analysis is exemplified through an investigation of welfarism as a mode of 'social' government. The paper concludes with a brief consideration of neo-liberalism which demonstrates that the analytical language structured by the philosophical opposition of state and civil society is unable to comprehend contemporary transformations in modes of exercise of political power.(1).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20092498     DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01247.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sociol        ISSN: 0007-1315


  23 in total

1.  Power, technology and social studies of health care: an infrastructural inversion.

Authors:  Casper Bruun Jensen
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-12-18

Review 2.  The changing role of veterinary expertise in the food chain.

Authors:  Gareth Enticott; Andrew Donaldson; Philip Lowe; Megan Power; Amy Proctor; Katy Wilkinson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Explaining Michigan: developing an ex post theory of a quality improvement program.

Authors:  Mary Dixon-Woods; Charles L Bosk; Emma Louise Aveling; Christine A Goeschel; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Visualizing Risk: Images, Risk and Fear in a Health Campaign.

Authors:  Jessica Kuperavage
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2017-06

5.  Personalised medicine: a critique on the future of health care.

Authors:  Jacqueline Savard
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 1.352

6.  Governing the moral economy: animal engineering, ethics and the liberal government of science.

Authors:  Alison Harvey; Brian Salter
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Governing therapy choices: power/knowledge in the treatment of progressive renal failure.

Authors:  Dave Holmes; Amélie M Perron; Marc Savoie
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 2.464

8.  Developing patient-centred care: an ethnographic study of patient perceptions and influence on quality improvement.

Authors:  Alicia Renedo; Cicely Marston
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Risk, governance and the experience of care.

Authors:  Alexandra Hillman; Win Tadd; Sian Calnan; Michael Calnan; Antony Bayer; Simon Read
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2013-01-29

10.  Qualitative study of views and experiences of performance management for healthcare-associated infections.

Authors:  L Brewster; C Tarrant; M Dixon-Woods
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.