Literature DB >> 20091601

Zotepine versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia.

Katja Komossa1, Christine Rummel-Kluge, Heike Hunger, Franziska Schmid, Sandra Schwarz, Werner Kissling, Stefan Leucht.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In many countries of the industrialised world, second generation (atypical) antipsychotic drugs have become first line treatment for people with schizophrenia. The question as to whether the effects of various second generation antipsychotic drugs differ is a matter of debate. In this review we examined how the efficacy and tolerability of zotepine differs from that of other second generation antipsychotic drugs.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of zotepine compared with other second generation antipsychotic drugs for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (April 2007) which is based on regular searches of BIOSIS, CENTRAL CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised trials comparing oral zotepine with oral forms of amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, sertindole or ziprasidone in people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychoses. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis based on a random effects model. We calculated numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) where appropriate. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (MD) again based on a random effects model. MAIN
RESULTS: The review currently includes data from two short term, ill reported trials (total n=109). Both studies compared zotepine with clozapine. 34% of people left early but there was no significant difference between groups. Zotepine was less effective than clozapine (no clinically significant response: n=59, 1 RCT, RR 8.23 CI 1.14 to 59.17, NNH 3 CI 2 to 8; average score (BPRS total) at endpoint (n=59, 1 RCT, MD 6.00 CI 2.17 to 9.83). Zotepine induced more movement disorders than clozapine (use of antiparkinson medication: n=59, 1 RCT, RR 18.75 CI 1.17 to 301.08, NNH 3 CI 2 to 5) and higher prolactin levels (n=59, 1 RCT, MD 33.40 CI 14.87 to 51.93). Data on important other outcomes such as other adverse events, service use or satisfaction with care were not available. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Zotepine may be less effective than clozapine and associated with more movement disorders and higher prolactin levels, but the evidence base is too small and prone to bias, making any practical recommendations impossible. There is no randomised evidence on the effects of zotepine compared to second generation antipsychotic drugs other than clozapine. More studies are possible to justify.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20091601     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006628.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  7 in total

Review 1.  Zotepine versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Selvizhi Subramanian; Christine Rummel-Kluge; Heike Hunger; Franziska Schmid; Sandra Schwarz; Werner Kissling; Stefan Leucht; Katja Komossa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-10-06

Review 2.  Systematic Literature Review of the Methods Used to Compare Newer Second-Generation Agents for the Management of Schizophrenia: A focus on Health Technology Assessment.

Authors:  Gregory Kruse; Bruce J O Wong; Mei Sheng Duh; Patrick Lefebvre; Marie-Hélène Lafeuille; John M Fastenau
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Second-generation antipsychotic drugs and extrapyramidal side effects: a systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head comparisons.

Authors:  Christine Rummel-Kluge; Katja Komossa; Sandra Schwarz; Heike Hunger; Franziska Schmid; Werner Kissling; John M Davis; Stefan Leucht
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 4.  Head-to-head comparisons of metabolic side effects of second generation antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christine Rummel-Kluge; Katja Komossa; Sandra Schwarz; Heike Hunger; Franziska Schmid; Claudia Asenjo Lobos; Werner Kissling; John M Davis; Stefan Leucht
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Prior antipsychotic drug treatment prevents response to novel antipsychotic agent in the methylazoxymethanol acetate model of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Kathryn M Gill; James M Cook; Michael M Poe; Anthony A Grace
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Simultaneous Comparison of Efficacy and Tolerability of Second-Generation Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia: Mixed-Treatment Comparison Analysis Based on Head-to-Head Trial Data.

Authors:  Gyu Han Oh; Je-Chun Yu; Kyeong-Sook Choi; Eun-Jeong Joo; Seong-Hoon Jeong
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.505

Review 7.  A Review of the Updated Pharmacophore for the Alpha 5 GABA(A) Benzodiazepine Receptor Model.

Authors:  Terry Clayton; Michael M Poe; Sundari Rallapalli; Poonam Biawat; Miroslav M Savić; James K Rowlett; George Gallos; Charles W Emala; Catherine C Kaczorowski; Douglas C Stafford; Leggy A Arnold; James M Cook
Journal:  Int J Med Chem       Date:  2015-11-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.