| Literature DB >> 20090841 |
Nicholas A Giovinco1, Trung D Bui, Timothy Fisher, Joseph L Mills, David G Armstrong.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Although the use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is broadly efficacious, it may foster some potentially adverse complications. This is particularly true in patients with diabetes who have a wound colonized with aerobic organisms. Traditional antiseptics have been proven useful to combat such bacteria but require removal of some NPWT devices to be effective.Entities:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20090841 PMCID: PMC2806786
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eplasty ISSN: 1937-5719
Figure 1Four images to exemplify the devices, dressings, and modifications used in this study. (a) ITI Sved foam dressing with an infusion and drainage port; (b) a modified KCI VAC dressing with an intravenous (IV) pump infusion catheter; (c) KCI VAC with Sved infusion catheter; and (d) a modified KCI VAC foam dressing with an IV pump infusion catheter.
Figure 2Examples of cases 1 to 4 before wound chemotherapy treatment: (a) case 1; (b) case 2; (c) case 3; and (d) case 4.
Figure 3Examples of cases 1 to 4 after wound chemotherapy treatment for the number of followed days: (a) case 1; (b) case 2; (c) case 3; and (d) case 4.
Figure 4A 3-step method for the modification of a standard VAC foam dressing with a standard disposable suture removal kit. (a) Step 1: The initial slit in the dressing using scissors and countersinking of underlying foam using tweezers to accommodate the interface of the intravenous (IV) tubing. (b) Step 2: Insertion of the IV tubing interface into the foam through the covering dressing. (c) Step 3: The application of dressing seal around the IV tubing.