Literature DB >> 20090377

Standardized parenteral nutrition in preterm infants: early impact on fluid and electrolyte balance.

Silvia Iacobelli1, Francesco Bonsante, Amélie Vintéjoux, Jean-Bernard Gouyon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Parenteral nutrition is commonly given to premature infants. It has previously been suggested that standardized parenteral nutrition (SPN) may offer nutritional advantages compared to individualized parenteral nutrition (IPN). However, whether the same level of biochemical control is assured with SPN and with IPN remains uncertain.
OBJECTIVES: To compare fluid and electrolyte balance in preterm infants receiving IPN versus SPN in the first week of life.
METHODS: 107 infants born at <33 weeks gestation were prospectively evaluated. Serum and urinary creatinine and electrolyte concentration, urine volume, body weight, fluid, electrolyte and energy intakes were recorded daily.
RESULTS: 40 infants received IPN and 67 SPN. Infants in IPN had significantly more water and less sodium intake than those receiving SPN. Energy and amino acid intakes were significantly lower in IPN than in SPN groups. Incidence of hypernatremia and hyponatremia was similar in both groups. Nonoliguric hyperkalemia (NOHK) was significantly more frequent in IPN than in SPN (20.0 vs. 2.9%) and mean serum K(+) peak over the first 3 days was higher in IPN than in SPN (5.63 +/- 1.05 vs. 4.91 +/- 0.78 mmol/l). Weight loss (% of birth weight) at day 7 was significantly higher in IPN than in SPN (7.7 +/- 5.8 vs. 4.2 +/- 6.5) without differences in urine output/input fluid intake ratio and glomerular renal function between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in water and sodium balance in preterm infants who received IPN versus SPN. The risk of NOHK was higher in IPN. Also, SPN significantly increased amino acid and caloric intakes, and it reduced early weight loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20090377     DOI: 10.1159/000276979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neonatology        ISSN: 1661-7800            Impact factor:   4.035


  15 in total

1.  Paediatric parenteral nutrition: current issues.

Authors:  Elena Cernat; John Puntis
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-07-09

2.  Automated compounding of parenteral nutrition for pediatric patients: characterization of workload and costs.

Authors:  Mélina Raimbault; Maxime Thibault; Denis Lebel; Jean-François Bussières
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-10

3.  Chloride Balance in Preterm Infants during the First Week of Life.

Authors:  Silvia Iacobelli; Elsa Kermorvant-Duchemin; Francesco Bonsante; Alexandre Lapillonne; Jean-Bernard Gouyon
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2012-03-08

Review 4.  Higher versus lower amino acid intake in parenteral nutrition for newborn infants.

Authors:  David A Osborn; Tim Schindler; Lisa J Jones; John Kh Sinn; Srinivas Bolisetty
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-05

5.  The Effect of Individualized Versus Standardized Parenteral Nutrition on Body Weight in Very Preterm Infants.

Authors:  Vincent H M Evering; Peter Andriessen; Carola E P M Duijsters; Jeroen Brogtrop; Luc J J Derijks
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2017-02-21

Review 6.  Risk of parenteral nutrition in neonates--an overview.

Authors:  Walter Zingg; Maren Tomaske; Maria Martin
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 7.  Standardised parenteral nutrition.

Authors:  Karen Simmer; Abhijeet Rakshasbhuvankar; Girish Deshpande
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Initial amino acid intake influences phosphorus and calcium homeostasis in preterm infants--it is time to change the composition of the early parenteral nutrition.

Authors:  Francesco Bonsante; Silvia Iacobelli; Giuseppe Latorre; Jacques Rigo; Claudio De Felice; Pierre Yves Robillard; Jean Bernard Gouyon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Standardised neonatal parenteral nutrition formulations - an Australasian group consensus 2012.

Authors:  Srinivas Bolisetty; David Osborn; John Sinn; Kei Lui
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  Risk Factors for the Development of Refeeding Syndrome-Like Hypophosphatemia in Very Low Birth Weight Infants.

Authors:  Aiko Igarashi; Takashi Okuno; Genrei Ohta; Shuko Tokuriki; Yusei Ohshima
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.434

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.