| Literature DB >> 20090324 |
M Ando1, G J Eckert, D T Zero.
Abstract
This study evaluated the ability of tactile sensations to distinguish roughness. Five examiners experienced in visual examination participated. Tactile sensation was assessed by 3 standard references, the average roughnesses 0.49, 0.92 and 1.54 mum. The examiners evaluated the roughness using 2 different ends of sharp explorers (TU 17 SE and 23 SE), each with 2 different handles (Standard Handle and No. 6 Handle-Satin Steel), and 1 WHO probe using a 5-point response score. The examiners performed 3 evaluations to establish repeatability. Using the 23 SE explorer with the steel handle was the best option to distinguish between 3 roughnesses (p < 0.05). The intraexaminer intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were between 0.90 and 0.98, but the interexaminer ICC were only between 0 and 0.04, indicating that, although trained examiners could repeat their own scores, they were not consistent with each other in grading roughness. Copyright 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20090324 DOI: 10.1159/000275570
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Caries Res ISSN: 0008-6568 Impact factor: 4.056