Farah McCrate1, Marshall Godwin, Laura Murphy. 1. Office for Aging and Seniors, Department of Health and Community Services, Newfoundland and Laborador, St. John's.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the degree to which targets for diabetes (blood pressure [BP], glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c], and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C]) are achieved in family practices and how these results compare with family physicians' perceptions of how well targets are being achieved. DESIGN: Chart audit and physician survey. SETTING: Newfoundland and Labrador. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with type 2 diabetes and their family physicians. INTERVENTIONS: The charts of 20 patients with type 2 diabetes were randomly chosen from each of 8 family physician practices in St John's, Nfld, and data were abstracted. All family physicians in the province were surveyed using a modified Dillman method. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The most recent HbA1c, LDL-C, and BP measurements listed in each audited chart; surveyed family physicians' knowledge of the recommended targets for HbA1c, LDL-C, and BP and their estimates of what percentage of their patients were at those recommended targets. RESULTS: The chart audit revealed that 20.6% of patients were at the recommended target for BP, 48.1% were at the recommended target for HbA1c, and 17.5% were at the recommended target for LDL-C. When targets were examined collectively, only 2.5% of patients were achieving targets in all 3 areas. The survey found that most family physicians were aware of the recommended targets for BP, LDL-C, and HbA1c. However, their estimates of the percentages of patients in their practices achieving these targets appeared high (59.3% for BP, 58.2% for HbA1c, and 48.4% for LDL-C) compared with the results of the chart audit. CONCLUSION: The findings of the chart audit are consistent with other published reports, which have illustrated that a large majority of patients with diabetes fall short of reaching recommended targets for BP, blood glucose, and lipid levels. Although family physicians are knowledgeable about recommended targets, there is a gap between knowledge and clinical outcomes. The reasons for this are likely multifactorial. Further investigation is needed to better understand this phenomenon as well as to understand the foundation for physicians' optimistic estimates of how many of their patients with diabetes were reaching target values.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the degree to which targets for diabetes (blood pressure [BP], glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c], and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C]) are achieved in family practices and how these results compare with family physicians' perceptions of how well targets are being achieved. DESIGN: Chart audit and physician survey. SETTING: Newfoundland and Labrador. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with type 2 diabetes and their family physicians. INTERVENTIONS: The charts of 20 patients with type 2 diabetes were randomly chosen from each of 8 family physician practices in St John's, Nfld, and data were abstracted. All family physicians in the province were surveyed using a modified Dillman method. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The most recent HbA1c, LDL-C, and BP measurements listed in each audited chart; surveyed family physicians' knowledge of the recommended targets for HbA1c, LDL-C, and BP and their estimates of what percentage of their patients were at those recommended targets. RESULTS: The chart audit revealed that 20.6% of patients were at the recommended target for BP, 48.1% were at the recommended target for HbA1c, and 17.5% were at the recommended target for LDL-C. When targets were examined collectively, only 2.5% of patients were achieving targets in all 3 areas. The survey found that most family physicians were aware of the recommended targets for BP, LDL-C, and HbA1c. However, their estimates of the percentages of patients in their practices achieving these targets appeared high (59.3% for BP, 58.2% for HbA1c, and 48.4% for LDL-C) compared with the results of the chart audit. CONCLUSION: The findings of the chart audit are consistent with other published reports, which have illustrated that a large majority of patients with diabetes fall short of reaching recommended targets for BP, blood glucose, and lipid levels. Although family physicians are knowledgeable about recommended targets, there is a gap between knowledge and clinical outcomes. The reasons for this are likely multifactorial. Further investigation is needed to better understand this phenomenon as well as to understand the foundation for physicians' optimistic estimates of how many of their patients with diabetes were reaching target values.
Authors: Gavin Putzer; Richard Roetzheim; Arnold M Ramirez; Kevin Sneed; H J Brownlee; Robert J Campbell Journal: J Am Board Fam Pract Date: 2004 Mar-Apr
Authors: Stewart B Harris; Moira Stewart; Judith Belle Brown; Stephen Wetmore; Catherine Faulds; Susan Webster-Bogaert; Sheila Porter Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Suzanne Murray; Patrice Lazure; Sara Schroter; Philipp J Leuschner; Peter Posel; Thomas Kellner; Richard D Jenkins Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Marshall Godwin; Farah McCrate; Leigh Anne Newhook; Andrea Pike; John Crellin; Rebecca Law; Maria Mathews; Nurun L Chowdhury Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Wayne Putnam; Beverley Lawson; Farokh Buhariwalla; Mary Goodfellow; Rose Anne Goodine; Jennifer Hall; Kendrick Lacey; Ian MacDonald; Frederick I Burge; Nandini Natarajan; Ingrid Sketris; Beth Mann; Peggy Dunbar; Kristine Van Aarsen; Marshall S Godwin Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2011-08-11 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Michel P Hermans; Moses Elisaf; Georges Michel; Erik Muls; Frank Nobels; Hans Vandenberghe; Carlos Brotons Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-07-11 Impact factor: 19.112