OBJECTIVES: To describe the emergence of linezolid-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) of sequence type (ST)36 lineage in two paediatric patients with cystic fibrosis, after long-term low-dose linezolid treatment. METHODS: Two paediatric males with cystic fibrosis had sputum samples quantitatively cultured during hospitalization. After the isolation of MRSA from both patients, oral treatment with 300 mg linezolid twice daily was initiated for periods of 1-2 months separated by up to 6 months. Isolates cultured 9 months after the start of treatment were tested for resistance to linezolid by agar dilution (BSAC). Resistant isolates were examined for 23S rDNA mutations, and typed by phage and macrorestriction with SmaI. Isolates from follow-up sputum samples were obtained until 44-51 months after treatment with linezolid. RESULTS: Colonization with MRSA was at a density of approximately 10(6) cfu/mL sputum for both subjects. Initial isolates were susceptible to linezolid, but, 9 months later, isolates from both patients were resistant (MICs > 16 mg/L). Both isolates were epidemic MRSA-16 variant A1 (ST36-MRSA-II), which is widespread in UK hospitals. Both isolates were heterozygous for a G2576T mutation in their 23S rDNA genes, but one was resistant to fusidic acid and tetracycline. In follow-up sampling, the younger patient yielded linezolid-resistant EMRSA-16 for a further 42 months, whilst the other lost the linezolid-resistant MRSA and had alternately Pseudomonas aeruginosa or linezolid-susceptible EMRSA-16 variant A1 isolated over 35 further months. CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid resistance emerged in two isolates of ST36 MRSA colonizing the lungs of two paediatric cystic fibrosis patients. Subtherapeutic levels of linezolid may have facilitated the selection of resistance.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the emergence of linezolid-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) of sequence type (ST)36 lineage in two paediatric patients with cystic fibrosis, after long-term low-dose linezolid treatment. METHODS: Two paediatric males with cystic fibrosis had sputum samples quantitatively cultured during hospitalization. After the isolation of MRSA from both patients, oral treatment with 300 mg linezolid twice daily was initiated for periods of 1-2 months separated by up to 6 months. Isolates cultured 9 months after the start of treatment were tested for resistance to linezolid by agar dilution (BSAC). Resistant isolates were examined for 23S rDNA mutations, and typed by phage and macrorestriction with SmaI. Isolates from follow-up sputum samples were obtained until 44-51 months after treatment with linezolid. RESULTS: Colonization with MRSA was at a density of approximately 10(6) cfu/mL sputum for both subjects. Initial isolates were susceptible to linezolid, but, 9 months later, isolates from both patients were resistant (MICs > 16 mg/L). Both isolates were epidemic MRSA-16 variant A1 (ST36-MRSA-II), which is widespread in UK hospitals. Both isolates were heterozygous for a G2576T mutation in their 23S rDNA genes, but one was resistant to fusidic acid and tetracycline. In follow-up sampling, the younger patient yielded linezolid-resistant EMRSA-16 for a further 42 months, whilst the other lost the linezolid-resistant MRSA and had alternately Pseudomonas aeruginosa or linezolid-susceptible EMRSA-16 variant A1 isolated over 35 further months. CONCLUSIONS:Linezolid resistance emerged in two isolates of ST36 MRSA colonizing the lungs of two paediatric cystic fibrosispatients. Subtherapeutic levels of linezolid may have facilitated the selection of resistance.
Authors: Rebecca A Keel; Andre Schaeftlein; Charlotte Kloft; J Samuel Pope; R Frederic Knauft; Marianne Muhlebach; David P Nicolau; Joseph L Kuti Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2011-04-25 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Andrea Endimiani; Kristine M Hujer; Andrea M Hujer; Sebastian Kurz; Michael R Jacobs; David S Perlin; Robert A Bonomo Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Andrea Endimiani; Martha Blackford; Elliot C Dasenbrook; Michael D Reed; Saralee Bajaksouszian; Andrea M Hujer; Susan D Rudin; Kristine M Hujer; Vincent Perreten; Louis B Rice; Michael R Jacobs; Michael W Konstan; Robert A Bonomo Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2011-01-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Alexander A Firsov; Maria V Golikova; Elena N Strukova; Yury A Portnoy; Andrey V Romanov; Mikhail V Edelstein; Stephen H Zinner Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Wei Gao; Kyra Chua; John K Davies; Hayley J Newton; Torsten Seemann; Paul F Harrison; Natasha E Holmes; Hyun-Woo Rhee; Jong-In Hong; Elizabeth L Hartland; Timothy P Stinear; Benjamin P Howden Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2010-06-10 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Sonya L Heltshe; Lisa Saiman; Elena B Popowitch; Melissa B Miller; Margaret Kloster; Valeria Thompson; Thomas W Ferkol; Wynton C Hoover; Michael S Schechter; Marianne S Muhlebach Journal: J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc Date: 2014-06-09 Impact factor: 3.164