BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: No large, randomized, double-blind trials in children with proteinuria treated withangiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers have previously been reported. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This 12-week, double-blind, multinational study investigated the effects of losartan 0.7 to 1.4 mg/kg per day compared with placebo (normotensive stratum) or amlodipine 0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg per day up to 5 mg/d (hypertensive stratum) on proteinuria (morning-void urinary protein-creatinine ratio, baseline > or =0.3 g/g) in 306 children up to 17 years of age. RESULTS: Twelve weeks of treatment with losartan significantly reduced proteinuria compared with amlodipine/placebo: losartan -35.8% (95% confidence interval: -27.6% to -43.1%) versus amlodipine/placebo 1.4% (95% confidence interval: -10.3% to 14.5%), P < or = 0.001. Significance remained after adjustment for differences across treatment groups in change in BP (losartan produced incremental systolic and diastolic BP reductions versus amlodipine of 5.4 and 4.6 mmHg, respectively; and versus placebo of 3.8 and 4.0 mmHg, respectively). Proteinuria reduction was consistently observed in the normotensive (-34.4% losartan; 2.6% placebo) and hypertensive (-41.5% losartan; 2.4% amlodipine) strata, and in all prespecified subgroups, including age, gender, race, Tanner stage, weight, prior therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, as well as among the most common etiologies of proteinuria. Adverse event incidence was low and comparable in all groups. CONCLUSIONS:Losartan significantly lowered proteinuria and was well tolerated after 12 weeks in children aged 1 to 17 years with proteinuria with or without hypertension, a population that has not previously been rigorously studied.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: No large, randomized, double-blind trials in children with proteinuria treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers have previously been reported. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This 12-week, double-blind, multinational study investigated the effects of losartan 0.7 to 1.4 mg/kg per day compared with placebo (normotensive stratum) or amlodipine 0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg per day up to 5 mg/d (hypertensive stratum) on proteinuria (morning-void urinary protein-creatinine ratio, baseline > or =0.3 g/g) in 306 children up to 17 years of age. RESULTS: Twelve weeks of treatment with losartan significantly reduced proteinuria compared with amlodipine/placebo: losartan -35.8% (95% confidence interval: -27.6% to -43.1%) versus amlodipine/placebo 1.4% (95% confidence interval: -10.3% to 14.5%), P < or = 0.001. Significance remained after adjustment for differences across treatment groups in change in BP (losartan produced incremental systolic and diastolic BP reductions versus amlodipine of 5.4 and 4.6 mmHg, respectively; and versus placebo of 3.8 and 4.0 mmHg, respectively). Proteinuria reduction was consistently observed in the normotensive (-34.4% losartan; 2.6% placebo) and hypertensive (-41.5% losartan; 2.4% amlodipine) strata, and in all prespecified subgroups, including age, gender, race, Tanner stage, weight, prior therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, as well as among the most common etiologies of proteinuria. Adverse event incidence was low and comparable in all groups. CONCLUSIONS:Losartan significantly lowered proteinuria and was well tolerated after 12 weeks in children aged 1 to 17 years with proteinuria with or without hypertension, a population that has not previously been rigorously studied.
Authors: E J Lewis; L G Hunsicker; W R Clarke; T Berl; M A Pohl; J B Lewis; E Ritz; R C Atkins; R Rohde; I Raz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-09-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lorenzo M D Franscini; Rodo O Von Vigier; Roger Pfister; Carmen Casaulta-Aebischer; Emilio Fossali; Mario G Bianchetti Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: B M Brenner; M E Cooper; D de Zeeuw; W F Keane; W E Mitch; H H Parving; G Remuzzi; S M Snapinn; Z Zhang; S Shahinfar Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-09-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Demetrius Ellis; Abhay Vats; Michael L Moritz; Susanne Reitz; Mary Jo Grosso; Janine E Janosky Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Colin Thomas White; Catherine Fiona Macpherson; Robert Morrison Hurley; Douglas George Matsell Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2003-08-12 Impact factor: 3.714
Authors: Joseph T Flynn; Mark Mitsnefes; Christopher Pierce; Steven R Cole; Rulan S Parekh; Susan L Furth; Bradley A Warady Journal: Hypertension Date: 2008-08-25 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Mark J Osborn; Beau R Webber; Ronald T McElmurry; Kyle D Rudser; Anthony P DeFeo; Michael Muradian; Anna Petryk; Benedikt Hallgrimsson; Bruce R Blazar; Jakub Tolar; Elizabeth A Braunlin Journal: J Inherit Metab Dis Date: 2016-10-14 Impact factor: 4.982
Authors: Nicholas J A Webb; Shahnaz Shahinfar; Thomas G Wells; Rachid Massaad; Gilbert W Gleim; Christine McCrary Sisk; Chun Lam Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2012-12-04 Impact factor: 3.714
Authors: Rachel D Torok; Jennifer S Li; Prince J Kannankeril; Andrew M Atz; Raafat Bishai; Ellen Bolotin; Stefanie Breitenstein; Cathy Chen; Thomas Diacovo; Timothy Feltes; Patricia Furlong; Michael Hanna; Eric M Graham; Daphne Hsu; D Dunbar Ivy; Dianne Murphy; Lisa A Kammerman; Gregory Kearns; John Lawrence; Brigitte Lebeaut; Danshi Li; Christoph Male; Brian McCrindle; Pierre Mugnier; Jane W Newburger; Gail D Pearson; Vasum Peiris; Lisa Percival; Miriam Pina; Ronald Portman; Robert Shaddy; Norman L Stockbridge; Robert Temple; Kevin D Hill Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2018-02-10 Impact factor: 5.501