Literature DB >> 20089445

Neuromagnetic activation of primary and secondary somatosensory cortex following tactile-on and tactile-off stimulation.

Hideaki Onishi1, Mineo Oyama, Toshio Soma, Masayoshi Kubo, Hikari Kirimoto, Hiroatsu Murakami, Shigeki Kameyama.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings were performed to investigate the cortical activation following tactile-on and tactile-off stimulation.
METHODS: We used a 306-ch whole-head MEG system and a tactile stimulator driven by a piezoelectric actuator. Tactile stimuli were applied to the tip of right index finger. The interstimulus interval was set at 2000 ms, which included a constant stimulus of 1000 ms duration.
RESULTS: Prominent somatosensory evoked magnetic fields were recorded from the contralateral hemisphere at 57.5 ms and 133.0 ms after the onset of tactile-on stimulation and at 58.2 ms and 138.5 ms after the onset of tactile-off stimulation. All corresponding equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) were located in the primary somatosensory cortex (SI). Moreover, long-latency responses (168.7 ms after tactile-on stimulation, 169.8 ms after tactile-off stimulation) were detected from the ipsilateral hemisphere. The ECDs of these signals were identified in the secondary somatosensory cortex (SII).
CONCLUSIONS: The somatosensory evoked magnetic fields waveforms elicited by the two tactile stimuli (tactile-on and tactile-off stimuli) with a mechanical stimulator were strikingly similar. These mechanical stimuli elicited both contralateral SI and ipsilateral SII activities. SIGNIFICANCE: Tactile stimulation with a mechanical stimulator provides new possibilities for experimental designs in studies of the human mechanoreceptor system. 2009 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20089445     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  9 in total

1.  Vibrotactile piezoelectric stimulation system with precise and versatile timing control for somatosensory research.

Authors:  Limin Sun; Yoshio Okada
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  A Multivariate Logistical Model for Identifying the Compressive Sensitivity of Single Rat Tactile Receptors as Nanobiosensors.

Authors:  Sean S Kohles; Sam Bradshaw; Shelley S Mason; Fred J Looft
Journal:  J Nanotechnol Eng Med       Date:  2011-02-01

3.  Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability Depends on the Pattern of Mechanical Tactile Stimulation.

Authors:  Sho Kojima; Hideaki Onishi; Shota Miyaguchi; Shinichi Kotan; Ryoki Sasaki; Masaki Nakagawa; Hikari Kirimoto; Hiroyuki Tamaki
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.599

4.  The effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on pin protrusion patterns.

Authors:  Sho Kojima; Shota Miyaguchi; Ryoki Sasaki; Shota Tsuiki; Kei Saito; Yasuto Inukai; Naofumi Otsuru; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Mechanical Consequences of Dynamically Loaded NiTi Wires under Typical Actuator Conditions in Rehabilitation and Neuroscience.

Authors:  Umut D Çakmak; Zoltán Major; Michael Fischlschweiger
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2021-01-08

6.  Neuromagnetic activation following active and passive finger movements.

Authors:  Hideaki Onishi; Kazuhiro Sugawara; Koya Yamashiro; Daisuke Sato; Makoto Suzuki; Hikari Kirimoto; Hiroyuki Tamaki; Hiroatsu Murakami; Shigeki Kameyama
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 2.708

7.  Balance in Blind Subjects: Cane and Fingertip Touch Induce Similar Extent and Promptness of Stance Stabilization.

Authors:  Stefania Sozzi; Francesco Decortes; Monica Schmid; Oscar Crisafulli; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Action execution and action observation elicit mirror responses with the same temporal profile in human SII.

Authors:  Maria Del Vecchio; Fausto Caruana; Ivana Sartori; Veronica Pelliccia; Flavia Maria Zauli; Giorgio Lo Russo; Giacomo Rizzolatti; Pietro Avanzini
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2020-02-20

9.  The Repetitive Mechanical Tactile Stimulus Intervention Effects Depend on Input Methods.

Authors:  Hiraku Watanabe; Sho Kojima; Naofumi Otsuru; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.