Literature DB >> 20088958

Evaluation of selective culling of infected individuals to control tasmanian devil facial tumor disease.

Shelly Lachish1, Hamish McCallum, Dydee Mann, Chrissy E Pukk, Menna E Jones.   

Abstract

Sustainable strategies to manage infectious diseases in threatened wildlife are still lacking despite considerable concern over the global increase in emerging infectious diseases of wildlife and their potential to drive populations to extinction. Selective culling of infected individuals will often be the most feasible option to control infectious disease in a threatened wildlife host, but has seldom been implemented or evaluated as a management tool for the conservation of threatened species. The Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) is threatened with extinction by an infectious cancer, devil facial tumor disease (DFTD). We assess the success of an adaptive management trial involving selective culling of infected Tasmanian devils to control DFTD. Demographic and epidemiological parameters indicative of disease progression and impact were compared between the management site and a comparable unmanaged control site. Selective culling of infected individuals neither slowed rate of disease progression nor reduced population-level impacts of this debilitating disease. Culling mortality simply compensated for disease mortality in this system. Failure of selective culling to impede DFTD progress and reduce its impacts in the managed population was attributed to DFTD's frequency-dependent nature, its long latent period and high degree of infectivity, and the presence of a cryptic hidden disease reservoir or continual immigration of diseased individuals. We suggest that increasing the current removal rate and focusing removal efforts prior to the breeding season are options worth pursuing for future management of DFTD in this population. On the basis of our experience, we suggest that disease-management programs for threatened wildlife populations be developed on the principles of adaptive management and utilize a wide variety of strategies with regular reviews and adaptation of strategies undertaken as new information is obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20088958     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01429.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  23 in total

1.  React or wait: which optimal culling strategy to control infectious diseases in wildlife.

Authors:  Luca Bolzoni; Valentina Tessoni; Maria Groppi; Giulio A De Leo
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  When to kill a cull: factors affecting the success of culling wildlife for disease control.

Authors:  Jamie C Prentice; Naomi J Fox; Michael R Hutchings; Piran C L White; Ross S Davidson; Glenn Marion
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Disease and the dynamics of extinction.

Authors:  Hamish McCallum
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Density trends and demographic signals uncover the long-term impact of transmissible cancer in Tasmanian devils.

Authors:  Billie T Lazenby; Mathias W Tobler; William E Brown; Clare E Hawkins; Greg J Hocking; Fiona Hume; Stewart Huxtable; Philip Iles; Menna E Jones; Clare Lawrence; Sam Thalmann; Phil Wise; Howel Williams; Samantha Fox; David Pemberton
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 6.528

5.  Two Decades of the Impact of Tasmanian Devil Facial Tumor Disease.

Authors:  Gregory M Woods; Samantha Fox; Andrew S Flies; Cesar D Tovar; Menna Jones; Rodrigo Hamede; David Pemberton; A Bruce Lyons; Silvana S Bettiol
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.326

6.  Individual and population-level impacts of an emerging poxvirus disease in a wild population of great tits.

Authors:  Shelly Lachish; Michael B Bonsall; Becki Lawson; Andrew A Cunningham; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Badger responses to small-scale culling may compromise targeted control of bovine tuberculosis.

Authors:  Jon Bielby; Christl A Donnelly; Lisa C Pope; Terry Burke; Rosie Woodroffe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Mitigating amphibian disease: strategies to maintain wild populations and control chytridiomycosis.

Authors:  Douglas C Woodhams; Jaime Bosch; Cheryl J Briggs; Scott Cashins; Leyla R Davis; Antje Lauer; Erin Muths; Robert Puschendorf; Benedikt R Schmidt; Brandon Sheafor; Jamie Voyles
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  Genomic restructuring in the Tasmanian devil facial tumour: chromosome painting and gene mapping provide clues to evolution of a transmissible tumour.

Authors:  Janine E Deakin; Hannah S Bender; Anne-Maree Pearse; Willem Rens; Patricia C M O'Brien; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Yuanyuan Cheng; Katrina Morris; Robyn Taylor; Andrew Stuart; Katherine Belov; Chris T Amemiya; Elizabeth P Murchison; Anthony T Papenfuss; Jennifer A Marshall Graves
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Population estimation and trappability of the European badger (Meles meles): implications for tuberculosis management.

Authors:  Andrew W Byrne; James O'Keeffe; Stuart Green; D Paddy Sleeman; Leigh A L Corner; Eamonn Gormley; Denise Murphy; S Wayne Martin; John Davenport
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.