Literature DB >> 20088946

Androgen-responsive and -unresponsive prostate cancer cell lines respond differently to stimuli inducing neuroendocrine differentiation.

S Marchiani1, L Tamburrino, G Nesi, M Paglierani, S Gelmini, C Orlando, M Maggi, G Forti, E Baldi.   

Abstract

The treatment of advanced prostate cancer (CaP) with androgen deprivation therapy inevitably renders the tumours castration resistant and incurable. Under these conditions, neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) of CaP cells occurs and neuropeptides released by neuroendocrine cells facilitate tumour progression. Pharmacological strategies aiming to prevent or delay NED during androgen ablation could, therefore, increase the effectiveness of the therapy. Mechanisms and pathways inducing NED in CaP are poorly understood and data are often discordant. In the present study, we used several CaP cell lines (androgen-responsive: LNCaP, PC3-AR, 22RV1 and -irresponsive: DU145 and PC3) to evaluate NED after androgen deprivation or treatment with epidermal growth factor (EGF). NED was determined by neuron-specific enolase and chromogranin A expression and by the occurrence of morphological changes in the cells. Androgen-deprivation conditions induced NED in LNCaP and PC3-AR, but not in 22Rv1, PC3 and DU145 cells. LNCaP and PC3-AR cells also became resistant to thapsigargin-induced apoptosis. In all the AR-positive cell lines, androgen deprivation caused a decrease in androgen receptor expression indicating that it is downregulated irrespective of NED induction. Treatment with EGF induced NED in DU145 cells and the EGF receptor inhibitor gefinitib prevented the process. On the contrary, no effect of EGF was demonstrated in LNCaP or 22Rv1 cells. CaP cell lines did not respond univocally to treatments inducing NED, suggesting that studies on this topic should be performed in a wide spectrum of cell models which can be more indicative of the tumour variability in vivo.
© 2010 The Authors. International Journal of Andrology © 2010 European Academy of Andrology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20088946     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.01030.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Androl        ISSN: 0105-6263


  24 in total

1.  Non-THC cannabinoids inhibit prostate carcinoma growth in vitro and in vivo: pro-apoptotic effects and underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  Luciano De Petrocellis; Alessia Ligresti; Aniello Schiano Moriello; Mariagrazia Iappelli; Roberta Verde; Colin G Stott; Luigia Cristino; Pierangelo Orlando; Vincenzo Di Marzo
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Androgen receptor signaling regulates T-type Ca2+ channel expression and neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Megan Hall; Bryan Todd; Edwin D Allen; Nga Nguyen; Yoon-Jung Kwon; Vu Nguyen; Jennifer L Hearne; Miguel Martin-Caraballo
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 3.  Neuroendocrine Differentiation in Prostate Cancer: Emerging Biology, Models, and Therapies.

Authors:  Loredana Puca; Panagiotis J Vlachostergios; Himisha Beltran
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 6.915

4.  Triiodothyronine Attenuates Prostate Cancer Progression Mediated by β-Adrenergic Stimulation.

Authors:  Evangelina Delgado-González; Ana Alicia Sánchez-Tusie; Giapsy Morales; Carmen Aceves; Brenda Anguiano
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 6.354

5.  Ginsenoside Rh2 inhibits prostate cancer cell growth through suppression of microRNA-4295 that activates CDKN1A.

Authors:  Qiruo Gao; Junhua Zheng
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 6.831

6.  A Comprehensive Gene Expression Analysis of Resistance Formation upon Metronomic Cyclophosphamide Therapy.

Authors:  Rebekka Kubisch; Lilja Meissner; Stefan Krebs; Helmut Blum; Michael Günther; Andreas Roidl; Ernst Wagner
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

7.  Analyzing the Expression of Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Cell Lines.

Authors:  Chen-Ying Su; Gwo-Che Huang; You-Cheng Chang; Yu-Jen Chen; Hsu-Wei Fang
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 8.  Androgen regulation of prostate cancer: where are we now?

Authors:  G Corona; E Baldi; M Maggi
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 4.256

9.  PC3 is a cell line characteristic of prostatic small cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Sheng Tai; Yin Sun; Jill M Squires; Hong Zhang; William K Oh; Chao-Zhao Liang; Jiaoti Huang
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 4.104

10.  Isoform 1 of TPD52 (PC-1) promotes neuroendocrine transdifferentiation in prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Tom Moritz; Simone Venz; Heike Junker; Sarah Kreuz; Reinhard Walther; Uwe Zimmermann
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-02-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.