Literature DB >> 20088721

General versus spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean sections: effects on neonatal short-term outcome. A prospective randomised study.

Alfredo Mancuso1, Antonio De Vivo, Annamaria Giacobbe, Valentina Priola, Laura Maggio Savasta, Marianna Guzzo, Dominique De Vivo, Alba Mancuso.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare neonatal short-term outcome in patients who underwent spinal, general anaesthesia and conversion from spinal to general anaesthesia.
METHODS: One hundred seventy-nine pregnant women undergoing elective caesarean section were allocated randomly to general (n=89) or spinal anaesthesia (n=90) and compared with 63 patients who required conversion to general anaesthesia. Umbilical cord artery pH, Apgar score as well as its individual parameter and need for assisted ventilation were evaluated.
RESULTS: No differences were found in pH values (p=0.35), while the need for assisted ventilation differed significantly (p=0.001). The rate of depressed newborns was 1.1% in the spinal group, 25.9% in the general group and 12.7% in the conversion group with a significant difference for all comparisons. At 5-min, all newborns were vigorous. At 1 min, a higher score for each parameter was found in spinal group with respect to general group, while 'activity', 'grimace' and 'respiration' showed a higher score in conversion group than in general group. At 5 min, a difference was found only for 'activity'.
CONCLUSIONS: All kinds of anaesthesia seem to be safe, but loco-regional blockade shows more advantages on the neonatal outcome also when a conversion is necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20088721     DOI: 10.3109/14767050903572158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Recent standards in management of obstetric anesthesia].

Authors:  Maximiliaan van Erp; Clemens Ortner; Stefan Jochberger; Klaus Ulrich Klein
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2017-07-25

2.  Maternal and fetal outcomes following unplanned conversion to general anesthetic at elective cesarean section.

Authors:  C E Aiken; A R Aiken; J C Cole; J C Brockelsby; J H Bamber
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Influence of anaesthetic technique on maternal and foetal outcome in category 1 caesarean sections - A prospective single-centre observational study.

Authors:  Chitra Rajeswari Thangaswamy; Pankaj Kundra; Savitri Velayudhan; Lakshmi Narasimhan Aswini; P Veena
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2018-11

4.  Premedication practices for delivery room intubations in premature infants in France: Results from the EPIPAGE 2 cohort study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Walter-Nicolet; Emilie Courtois; Christophe Milesi; Pierre-Yves Ancel; Alain Beuchée; Pierre Tourneux; Valérie Benhammou; Ricardo Carbajal; Xavier Durrmeyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Spinal versus general anesthesia for Cesarean section in patients with sickle cell anemia.

Authors:  Mohamed H Bakri; Eman A Ismail; Gamal Ghanem; Mahmoud Shokry
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-09-30

6.  A comparison of the effects of ENTONOX inhalation and spinal anesthesia on labor pain reduction and apgar score in vaginal delivery: a clinical trial study.

Authors:  Samira Foji; Manijeh Yousefi Moghadam; Hosein TabasiAsl; Milad Nazarzadeh; Hamid Salehiniya
Journal:  Biomedicine (Taipei)       Date:  2018-08-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.