Literature DB >> 20088014

Systematic review and meta-analysis of currently available clinical evidence on migraine and patent foramen ovale percutaneous closure: much ado about nothing?

Gianfranco Butera1, Giuseppe G L Biondi-Zoccai, Mario Carminati, Luigi Caputi, Susanna Usai, Gennaro Bussone, Giovanni Meola, Angelica Bibiana Delogu, Imad Sheiban, Giuseppe Sangiorgi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the role of transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale on the occurrence of migraine.
BACKGROUND: In recent years, a potential relationship between, migraine, stroke, and patent foramen ovale (PFO) has emerged.
METHODS: BioMedCentral, Google Scholar, and PubMed from January 2000 to December 2008 were systematically searched for pertinent clinical studies. Secondary sources were also used. Secondary prevention studies of transcatheter closure for patent foramen ovale were required to include at least more than 10 patients followed for more than 6 months. The primary end-point was the rate of cured or significantly improved migraine after percutaneous PFO closure.
RESULTS: After excluding 637 citations, we finally included a total of 11 studies for a total of 1,306 patients. Forty percent of the subjects included suffered from migraine, while most had a previous history of transient ischemic attack/stroke and were investigated retrospectively. Quantitative synthesis showed that complete cure of migraine in 46% (95% C.I.25-67%), while resolution or significant improvement of migraine occurred in 83% (95% C.I. 78-88%) of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding the limitations inherent in the primary studies, this systematic review suggests that a significant group of subjects with migraine, in particular if treated after a neurological event, may benefit from percutaneous closure of their patent foramen ovale. However, many questions remain unsolved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20088014     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  9 in total

Review 1.  Migraine and patent foramen ovale.

Authors:  Jessica Ailani
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 2.  Patent foramen ovale: anatomy, outcomes, and closure.

Authors:  Patrick A Calvert; Bushra S Rana; Anna C Kydd; Leonard M Shapiro
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Alternatives to clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes: Prasugrel or ticagrelor?

Authors:  Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Marzia Lotrionte; Fiorenzo Gaita
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-26

4.  Migraine headaches following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Amit Noheria; John Roshan; Suraj Kapa; Komandoor Srivathsan; Douglas L Packer; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 5.  Migraine with aura and patent foramen ovale: myth or reality?

Authors:  C Finocchi; M Del Sette
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.307

6.  Stroke in young in India.

Authors:  Manjari Tripathi; Deepti Vibha
Journal:  Stroke Res Treat       Date:  2010-12-16

Review 7.  Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in 2019.

Authors:  Joel P Giblett; Omar Abdul-Samad; Leonard M Shapiro; Bushra S Rana; Patrick A Calvert
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-02

8.  Sensitivity of contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography for the detection of residual shunts after percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure.

Authors:  Hongling Zhao; Qingxiong Yue; Tao Wang; Lin Wang; Zhanqi Pang; He Dong; Jian Yang; Yawen Li; Shijun Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 9.  Migraine and Stroke: What's the Link? What to Do?

Authors:  Anna Gryglas; Robert Smigiel
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.081

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.