Literature DB >> 20087896

The prognostic role of immunohistochemical chromogranin a expression in prostate cancer patients is significantly modified by androgen-deprivation therapy.

Alfredo Berruti1, Enrico Bollito, Cecilia M Cracco, Marco Volante, Giovannino Ciccone, Francesco Porpiglia, Mauro Papotti, Roberto Mario Scarpa, Luigi Dogliotti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several data suggest that neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation in prostate cancer is implicated in the development of resistance to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). This study was undertaken to assess the prognostic role of tissue chromogranin A (CgA) expression in patients addressed to ADT as opposed to those who did not.
METHODS: Four hundred fourteen newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients, consecutively recruited in a single institution, entered the study. Two hundred fourteen patients received ADT early after diagnosis, 200 did not. Median follow-up was 85 months. CgA expression was evaluated immunohistochemically in prostate cancer needle biopsies.
RESULTS: In multivariate analysis after adjusting for Gleason score, serum PSA, disease stage and local treatments, tissue CgA expression in overall cases was significantly associated with a shorter survival (P = 0.009) but failed to be associated with PSA progression (P = 0.10). Dividing patients according to whether they received immediate ADT or not, tissue CgA was associated with a shorter time to PSA progression in ADT-treated patients (hazard ratios (HR) 1.96, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.37-2.81, P = 0.0001), but failed to be associated in those who did not (HR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.58-1.30, P = 0.49), interaction test P = 0.007. Conversely the survival effect of tissue CgA was not modified by ADT (interaction test, P = 0.41).
CONCLUSIONS: Tissue CgA expression, evaluated in prostate cancer needle biopsies at diagnosis, is an independent prognostic factor of survival in prostate cancer patients. The negative influence of NE differentiation on time to progression confined in ADT-treated patients suggests a role of NE differentiation in predicting endocrine resistance that deserves validation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20087896     DOI: 10.1002/pros.21104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  14 in total

Review 1.  The pathological diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors: common questions and tentative answers.

Authors:  Marco Volante; Luisella Righi; Alfredo Berruti; Guido Rindi; Mauro Papotti
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Increased neuroendocrine cells in resected metastases compared to primary colorectal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Marco Volante; Valerio Marci; Snezana Andrejevic-Blant; Veronica Tavaglione; Maria Carla Sculli; Marco Tampellini; Mauro Papotti
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 3.  Molecular aspects of prostate cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation.

Authors:  Qi Li; Connie S Zhang; Yifen Zhang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 4.  [Neuroendocrine prostate cancer].

Authors:  A Kretschmer; C Wittekind; C G Stief; C Gratzke
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Chromogranin A (CgA) as poor prognostic factor in patients with small cell carcinoma of the cervix: results of a retrospective study of 293 patients.

Authors:  Ling-Min Liao; Xin Zhang; Yu-Feng Ren; Xiao-Ying Sun; Na Di; Nan Zhou; Rui-Ke Pan; Shu-Hua Ma; Li-Xue Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Prostate cancer and neuroendocrine differentiation: more neuronal, less endocrine?

Authors:  Alexandru Dan Grigore; Eshel Ben-Jacob; Mary C Farach-Carson
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  The role of treatment modality on the utility of predictive tissue biomarkers in clinical prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Naveen Kachroo; Vincent J Gnanapragasam
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 8.  Prognostic role of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate cancer, putting together the pieces of the puzzle.

Authors:  Alfredo Berruti; Francesca Vignani; Lucianna Russo; Valentina Bertaglia; Mattia Tullio; Marcello Tucci; Massimiliano Poggio; Luigi Dogliotti
Journal:  Open Access J Urol       Date:  2010-07-23

Review 9.  Molecular markers for prostate cancer in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues.

Authors:  Tamara Sequeiros; Marta García; Melania Montes; Mireia Oliván; Marina Rigau; Eva Colás; Inés de Torres; Juan Morote; Jaume Reventós; Andreas Doll
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Neuroendocrine-like cells -derived CXCL10 and CXCL11 induce the infiltration of tumor-associated macrophage leading to the poor prognosis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yu-Jie Zeng; Wei Lai; Heng Wu; Lu Liu; He-Yang Xu; Jie Wang; Zhong-Hua Chu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-05-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.