Literature DB >> 20087336

A liver stiffness measurement-based, noninvasive prediction model for high-risk esophageal varices in B-viral liver cirrhosis.

Beom Kyung Kim1, Kwang-Hyub Han, Jun Yong Park, Sang Hoon Ahn, Ja Kyung Kim, Yong Han Paik, Kwan Sik Lee, Chae Yoon Chon, Do Young Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Periodic endoscopic screening for esophageal varices (EVs) and prophylactic treatment for high-risk EVs ((HEVs); (1) medium/large EVs and (2) small EVs with red sign or decompensated cirrhosis) are currently recommended for all cirrhotic patients. However, if a simple, noninvasive test is available, many low-risk patients may safely avoid endoscopy. We developed and validated a new liver stiffness measurement (LSM)-based prediction model for HEVs.
METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 280 consecutive B-viral cirrhosis patients from 2005 to 2007 (training set) and 121 from 2007 to 2008 (validation set). All underwent laboratory workups, endoscopy, LSM, and ultrasonography. For detection of HEVs, univariate and multivariate analysis were performed, using chi2-test/t-test and logistic regression, respectively. A prediction model was derived from multivariate predictors.
RESULTS: In the training set, 90 had HEVs, and multivariate analysis showed significant differences in LSM, spleen diameter, and platelet count between patients with and without HEVs. We developed LSM-spleen diameter to platelet ratio score (LSPS): LSM x spleen diameter/platelet count. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) in the training set was 0.954. At LSPS<3.5, 94.0% negative predictive value (NPV) was provided (184 patients), whereas 94.2% positive predictive value (PPV) was achieved (69 patients) at LSPS>5.5. Overall, the likelihood of HEVs was correctly diagnosed in 253 patients (90.3%). Its predictive values were maintained at similar accuracy in subsequent validation set (AUROC=0.953; 94.7% NPV/93.3% PPV at cutoff 3.5/5.5, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: LSPS is a reliable, noninvasive method for detection of HEVs. Patients with LSPS<3.5 may avoid endoscopy safely, whereas those with LSPS>5.5 should be considered for appropriate prophylactic treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20087336     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  56 in total

Review 1.  Performance of platelet count/spleen diameter ratio for diagnosis of esophageal varices in cirrhosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li Ying; Xiao Lin; Zuo-Liu Xie; Yuan-Ping Hu; Ke-Qing Shi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Critical comparison of elastography methods to assess chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Mireen Friedrich-Rust; Thierry Poynard; Laurent Castera
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 3.  Invasive and non-invasive diagnosis of cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

Authors:  Moon Young Kim; Woo Kyoung Jeong; Soon Koo Baik
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Clinical role of non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension.

Authors:  Massimo Bolognesi; Marco Di Pascoli; David Sacerdoti
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Clinical application of liver stiffness measurement using transient elastography in chronic liver disease from longitudinal perspectives.

Authors:  Beom Kyung Kim; James Fung; Man-Fung Yuen; Seung Up Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Prediction of esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis: usefulness of three-dimensional MR elastography with echo-planar imaging technique.

Authors:  Sung Ui Shin; Jeong-Min Lee; Mi Hye Yu; Jeong Hee Yoon; Joon Koo Han; Byung-Ihn Choi; Kevin J Glaser; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Quantitative Elastography Methods in Liver Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Authors:  Paul Kennedy; Mathilde Wagner; Laurent Castéra; Cheng William Hong; Curtis L Johnson; Claude B Sirlin; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Invasive and non-invasive techniques for detecting portal hypertension and predicting variceal bleeding in cirrhosis: a review.

Authors:  Enrico Maria Zardi; Francesco Maria Di Matteo; Claudio Maurizio Pacella; Arun J Sanyal
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 4.709

Review 9.  Noninvasive assessment of portal hypertension in cirrhosis: liver stiffness and beyond.

Authors:  Horia Stefanescu; Bogdan Procopet
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Management of small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: focus on portal hypertension.

Authors:  Virginia Hernandez-Gea; Fanny Turon; Annalisa Berzigotti; Augusto Villanueva
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.