Literature DB >> 20086114

Detection of tumor epidermal growth factor receptor pathway dependence by serum mass spectrometry in cancer patients.

Christine H Chung1, Erin H Seeley, Heinrich Roder, Julia Grigorieva, Maxim Tsypin, Joanna Roder, Barbara A Burtness, Athanassios Argiris, Arlene A Forastiere, Jill Gilbert, Barbara Murphy, Richard M Caprioli, David P Carbone, Ezra E W Cohen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that a serum proteomic profile predictive of survival benefit in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) reflects tumor EGFR dependency regardless of site of origin or class of therapeutic agent.
METHODS: Pretreatment serum or plasma from 230 patients treated with cetuximab, EGFR-TKIs, or chemotherapy for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) or colorectal cancer (CRC) were analyzed by mass spectrometry. Each sample was classified into "good" or "poor" groups using VeriStrat, and survival analyses of each cohort were done based on this classification. For the CRC cohort, this classification was correlated with the tumor EGFR ligand levels and KRAS mutation status.
RESULTS: In the EGFR inhibitor-treated cohorts, the classification predicted survival (HNSCC: gefitinib, P = 0.007 and erlotinib/bevacizumab, P = 0.02; CRC: cetuximab, P = 0.0065) whereas the chemotherapy cohort showed no survival difference. For CRC patients, tumor EGFR ligand RNA levels were significantly associated with the proteomic classification, and combined KRAS and proteomic classification provided improved survival classification.
CONCLUSIONS: Serum proteomic profiling can detect clinically significant tumor dependence on the EGFR pathway in non-small cell lung cancer, HNSCC, and CRC patients treated with either EGFR-TKIs or cetuximab. This classification is correlated with tumor EGFR ligand levels and provides a clinically practical way to identify patients with diverse cancer types most likely to benefit from EGFR inhibitors. Prospective studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20086114      PMCID: PMC2846615          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  32 in total

1.  Cetuximab shows activity in colorectal cancer patients with tumors that do not express the epidermal growth factor receptor by immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Ki Young Chung; Jinru Shia; Nancy E Kemeny; Manish Shah; Gary K Schwartz; Archie Tse; Audrey Hamilton; Dorothy Pan; Deborah Schrag; Lawrence Schwartz; David S Klimstra; Daniel Fridman; David P Kelsen; Leonard B Saltz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  ras mutations and expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  W G Yarbrough; C Shores; D L Witsell; M C Weissler; M E Fidler; T M Gilmer
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from "never smokers" and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib.

Authors:  William Pao; Vincent Miller; Maureen Zakowski; Jennifer Doherty; Katerina Politi; Inderpal Sarkaria; Bhuvanesh Singh; Robert Heelan; Valerie Rusch; Lucinda Fulton; Elaine Mardis; Doris Kupfer; Richard Wilson; Mark Kris; Harold Varmus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy.

Authors:  J Guillermo Paez; Pasi A Jänne; Jeffrey C Lee; Sean Tracy; Heidi Greulich; Stacey Gabriel; Paula Herman; Frederic J Kaye; Neal Lindeman; Titus J Boggon; Katsuhiko Naoki; Hidefumi Sasaki; Yoshitaka Fujii; Michael J Eck; William R Sellers; Bruce E Johnson; Matthew Meyerson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib.

Authors:  Thomas J Lynch; Daphne W Bell; Raffaella Sordella; Sarada Gurubhagavatula; Ross A Okimoto; Brian W Brannigan; Patricia L Harris; Sara M Haserlat; Jeffrey G Supko; Frank G Haluska; David N Louis; David C Christiani; Jeff Settleman; Daniel A Haber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  David Cunningham; Yves Humblet; Salvatore Siena; David Khayat; Harry Bleiberg; Armando Santoro; Danny Bets; Matthias Mueser; Andreas Harstrick; Chris Verslype; Ian Chau; Eric Van Cutsem
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Proteomic patterns of tumour subsets in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Yanagisawa; Yu Shyr; Baogang J Xu; Pierre P Massion; Paul H Larsen; Bill C White; John R Roberts; Mary Edgerton; Adriana Gonzalez; Sorena Nadaf; Jason H Moore; Richard M Caprioli; David P Carbone
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Eric Van Cutsem; Claus-Henning Köhne; Erika Hitre; Jerzy Zaluski; Chung-Rong Chang Chien; Anatoly Makhson; Geert D'Haens; Tamás Pintér; Robert Lim; György Bodoky; Jae Kyung Roh; Gunnar Folprecht; Paul Ruff; Christopher Stroh; Sabine Tejpar; Michael Schlichting; Johannes Nippgen; Philippe Rougier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Serum protein MALDI profiling to distinguish upper aerodigestive tract cancer patients from control subjects.

Authors:  David Sidransky; Rafael Irizarry; Joseph A Califano; Xianbin Li; Hening Ren; Nicole Benoit; Li Mao
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  KRAS mutations and primary resistance of lung adenocarcinomas to gefitinib or erlotinib.

Authors:  William Pao; Theresa Y Wang; Gregory J Riely; Vincent A Miller; Qiulu Pan; Marc Ladanyi; Maureen F Zakowski; Robert T Heelan; Mark G Kris; Harold E Varmus
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-01-25       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  25 in total

1.  Imaging: Mass spectrometry in HNSCC--a peek at response prediction?

Authors:  Mei-Kim Ang; D Neil Hayes
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Opportunities and challenges facing biomarker development for personalized head and neck cancer treatment.

Authors:  Alexandra Lucs; Benjamin Saltman; Christine H Chung; Bettie M Steinberg; David L Schwartz
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.147

3.  Serum biomarkers as potential predictors of antitumor activity of cetuximab-containing therapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Athanassios Argiris; Steve C Lee; Trevor Feinstein; Sufi Thomas; Barton F Branstetter; Raja Seethala; Lin Wang; William Gooding; Jennifer R Grandis; Robert L Ferris
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 5.337

4.  Writing in PROSE proteomic-based selection for second line treatment in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Lorenza Landi; Federico Cappuzzo
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-03

5.  Serum peptide expression and treatment responses in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Juan An; Chuan-Hao Tang; Na Wang; Yi Liu; Jin Lv; Bin Xu; Xiao-Yan Li; Wan-Feng Guo; Hong-Jun Gao; Kun He; Xiao-Qing Liu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Serum biomarker modulation following molecular targeting of epidermal growth factor and cyclooxygenase pathways: a pilot randomized trial in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Howard S Moskowitz; William E Gooding; Sufi M Thomas; Maria L Freilino; Neil Gross; Athanassios Argiris; Jennifer R Grandis; Robert L Ferris
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 5.337

7.  Prognostic and predictive role of the VeriStrat plasma test in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with erlotinib or placebo in the NCIC Clinical Trials Group BR.21 trial.

Authors:  David P Carbone; Keyue Ding; Heinrich Roder; Julia Grigorieva; Joanna Roder; Ming-Sound Tsao; Lesley Seymour; Frances A Shepherd
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 8.  Mass spectrometry-based serum and plasma peptidome profiling for prediction of treatment outcome in patients with solid malignancies.

Authors:  Mariette Labots; Lisette M Schütte; Johannes C van der Mijn; Thang V Pham; Connie R Jiménez; Henk M W Verheul
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-09-03

9.  Gene expression profiles can predict panitumumab monotherapy responsiveness in human tumor xenograft models.

Authors:  Michael J Boedigheimer; Daniel J Freeman; Panteha Kiaei; Michael A Damore; Robert Radinsky
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 10.  Proteomic biomarkers in lung cancer.

Authors:  M D Pastor; A Nogal; S Molina-Pinelo; A Carnero; L Paz-Ares
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 3.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.