OBJECTIVE: To see, if voluntary admission for treatment in first-episode psychosis results in better adherence to treatment and more favourable outcome than involuntary admission. METHOD: We compared consecutively first-admitted, hospitalised patients from a voluntary (n = 91) with an involuntary (n = 126) group as to psychopathology and functioning using Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and Global Assessment of Functioning Scales at baseline, after 3 months and at 2 year follow-up. Moreover, duration of supportive psychotherapy, medication and number of hospitalisations during the 2 years were measured. RESULTS: More women than men were admitted involuntarily. Voluntary patients had less psychopathology and better functioning than involuntary patients at baseline. No significant difference as to duration of psychotherapy and medication between groups was found. No significant difference was found as to psychopathology and functioning between voluntarily and involuntarily admitted patients at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Legal admission status per se did not seem to influence treatment adherence and outcome.
OBJECTIVE: To see, if voluntary admission for treatment in first-episode psychosis results in better adherence to treatment and more favourable outcome than involuntary admission. METHOD: We compared consecutively first-admitted, hospitalised patients from a voluntary (n = 91) with an involuntary (n = 126) group as to psychopathology and functioning using Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and Global Assessment of Functioning Scales at baseline, after 3 months and at 2 year follow-up. Moreover, duration of supportive psychotherapy, medication and number of hospitalisations during the 2 years were measured. RESULTS: More women than men were admitted involuntarily. Voluntary patients had less psychopathology and better functioning than involuntarypatients at baseline. No significant difference as to duration of psychotherapy and medication between groups was found. No significant difference was found as to psychopathology and functioning between voluntarily and involuntarily admitted patients at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Legal admission status per se did not seem to influence treatment adherence and outcome.
Authors: Sönke Johann Peters; Mario Schmitz-Buhl; Olaf Karasch; Jürgen Zielasek; Euphrosyne Gouzoulis-Mayfrank Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 4.144
Authors: Daniel Thomas Chung; Christopher James Ryan; Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic; Swaran Preet Singh; Clive Stanton; Matthew Michael Large Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Lucie Kalisova; Jiri Raboch; Alexander Nawka; Gaia Sampogna; Libor Cihal; Thomas W Kallert; Georgi Onchev; Anastasia Karastergiou; Valeria Del Vecchio; Andrzej Kiejna; Tomasz Adamowski; Francisco Torres-Gonzales; Jorge A Cervilla; Stephan Priebe; Domenico Giacco; Lars Kjellin; Algirdas Dembinskas; Andrea Fiorillo Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2014-04-16 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Anne Opsal; Øistein Kristensen; Tor K Larsen; Gro Syversen; Elise Bakke Aasen Rudshaug; Arne Gerdner; Thomas Clausen Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2013-02-12 Impact factor: 2.655