Literature DB >> 20084809

Post-infectious olfactory loss: a cohort study and update.

P Rombaux1, S Martinage, C Huart, S Collet.   

Abstract

Post-infectious olfactory loss is defined as an olfactory dysfunction in the course of an upper respiratory tract infection. Quantitative olfactory dysfunction is usually moderate to severe, with many patients experiencing a qualitative disorder such as parosmia. Diagnosis is made on the basis of patient history, normal clinical examination (no inflammatory disease in the olfactory cleft) and decreased olfactory function. This paper provides an update of pathophysiology, clinical management and prognosis, and also looks at the clinical characteristic of a cohort of 122 patients from our department. Results from orthonasal and retronasal testing, chemosensory event-related potentials and olfactory bulb volume confirmed previous findings: our post-infectious olfactory patients were middle-aged women (sex ratio 2.4; mean age 53.9), with 47.5% and 18% of them complaining of parosmia and phantosmia respectively. More of them were hyposmic than anosmic (64.7% and 35.3% respectively) and 18 suffered repeat episodes. Olfactory bulb volume was correlated to psychophysical olfactory testing and orthonasal to retronasal scores. Olfactory-event-related potentials were found in about one-third of the patients and the vast majority of them had reproducible intranasal trigeminal event-related potentials. As there is no proven medical therapy for this disease, complete clinical evaluation of the patients may help to counsel patients about the recovery prognosis that applies to one-third of them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20084809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  B-ENT        ISSN: 1781-782X            Impact factor:   0.082


  7 in total

1.  Olfactory bulb surroundings can help to distinguish Parkinson's disease from non-parkinsonian olfactory dysfunction.

Authors:  Cécilia Tremblay; Jie Mei; Johannes Frasnelli
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 4.881

Review 2.  Clinical Implications of Psychophysical Olfactory Testing: Assessment, Diagnosis, and Treatment Outcome.

Authors:  Baihan Su; Benjamin Bleier; Yongxiang Wei; Dawei Wu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  A systematic review of olfactory-related brain structural changes in patients with congenital or acquired anosmia.

Authors:  Hanani Abdul Manan; Noorazrul Yahya; Pengfei Han; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 3.270

4.  The diagnostic value of the olfactory evaluation for congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

Authors:  Bingqing Yu; Kepu Chen; Jiangfeng Mao; Bo Hou; Hui You; Xi Wang; Min Nie; Qibin Huang; Rui Zhang; Yiyi Zhu; Bang Sun; Feng Feng; Wen Zhou; Xueyan Wu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 6.055

Review 5.  The impact of expertise in olfaction.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Royet; Jane Plailly; Anne-Lise Saive; Alexandra Veyrac; Chantal Delon-Martin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-13

Review 6.  The influences of age on olfaction: a review.

Authors:  Richard L Doty; Vidyulata Kamath
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-07

Review 7.  Anosmia: A review in the context of coronavirus disease 2019 and orofacial pain.

Authors:  Davis C Thomas; Sita Mahalakshmi Baddireddy; Divya Kohli
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.634

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.