Literature DB >> 20084470

Scale up and application of biosurfactant from Bacillus subtilis in Enhanced Oil recovery.

Hossein Amani1, Mohammad Reza Mehrnia, Mohammad Hossein Sarrafzadeh, Manouchehr Haghighi, Mohammad Reza Soudi.   

Abstract

There is a lack of fundamental knowledge about the scale up of biosurfactant production. In order to develop suitable technology of commercialization, carrying out tests in shake flasks and bioreactors was essential. A reactor with integrated foam collector was designed for biosurfactant production using Bacillus subtilis isolated from agricultural soil. The yield of biosurfactant on biomass (Y(p/x)), biosurfactant on sucrose (Y(p/s)), and the volumetric production rate (Y) for shake flask were obtained about 0.45 g g(-1), 0.18 g g(-1), and 0.03 g l(-1) h(-1), respectively. The best condition for bioreactor was 300 rpm and 1.5 vvm, giving Y(x/s), Y(p/x), Y(p/s), and Y of 0.42 g g(-1), 0.595 g g(-1), 0.25 g g(-1), and 0.057 g l(-1) h(-1), respectively. The biosurfactant maximum production, 2.5 g l(-1), was reached in 44 h of growth, which was 28% better than the shake flask. The obtained volumetric oxygen transfer coefficient (K(L)a) values at optimum conditions in the shake flask and the bioreactor were found to be around 0.01 and 0.0117 s(-1), respectively. Comparison of K(L)a values at optimum conditions shows that biosurfactant production scaling up from shake flask to bioreactor can be done with K(L) a as scale up criterion very accurately. Nearly 8% of original oil in place was recovered using this biosurfactant after water flooding in the sand pack.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20084470     DOI: 10.1007/s12010-009-8889-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol        ISSN: 0273-2289            Impact factor:   2.926


  8 in total

Review 1.  Biosurfactants during in situ bioremediation: factors that influence the production and challenges in evalution.

Authors:  Andressa Decesaro; Thaís Strieder Machado; Ângela Carolina Cappellaro; Christian Oliveira Reinehr; Antônio Thomé; Luciane Maria Colla
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Dynamic surface tension and adsorption mechanism of surfactin biosurfactant at the air-water interface.

Authors:  Sagheer A Onaizi
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 1.733

3.  Kinetics and Production of Rhamnolipid from Pseudomonas sp. TMB2 in Shake-Flask and Fabricated Batch Reactor.

Authors:  Saurav Haloi; Tapas Medhi
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-25

4.  A low-cost brewery waste as a carbon source in bio-surfactant production.

Authors:  Talita Corrêa Nazareth; Conrado Planas Zanutto; Danielle Maass; Antônio Augusto Ulson de Souza; Selene Maria de Arruda Guelli Ulson de Souza
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Response Surface Methodology for Optimizing the Production of Biosurfactant by Candida tropicalis on Industrial Waste Substrates.

Authors:  Darne G Almeida; Rita de Cássia F Soares da Silva; Juliana M Luna; Raquel D Rufino; Valdemir A Santos; Leonie A Sarubbo
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Rhamnolipids Sustain Unchanged Surface Activities during Decomposition in Alkaline Solutions.

Authors:  Shuai Kong; Chong Shen; Yizeng Li; Qin Meng
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-06-08

7.  A proteomic approach provides new insights into the control of soil-borne plant pathogens by Bacillus species.

Authors:  Omür Baysal; Duo Lai; Han-Hong Xu; Mirko Siragusa; Mikail Calışkan; Francesco Carimi; Jaime A Teixeira da Silva; Mahmut Tör
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Biosurfactants in agriculture.

Authors:  Dhara P Sachdev; Swaranjit S Cameotra
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 4.813

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.