OBJECTIVE: To determine the potential of helical CT for differentiating true lesions from pseudolesions in patients with fatty liver. METHODS: Helical CT of 44 patients with diffuse fatty liver (22 with true lesions; 22 with pseudolesions) were reviewed by two observers with regard to morphological features of visible lesions. Univariate analysis was used to detect discriminating criteria for the diagnosis of true lesions. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was excellent for 9/10 morphological criteria (kappa = 0.831-1). True lesions were more frequently distant from the liver capsule (50.00% vs. 4.55%), located in the right lobe (72.73% vs. 31.82%), round (86.36% vs. 54.55%), heterogeneous (27.27% vs. 0.00%) and had ill-defined margins (40.91% vs. 13.64%) compared with pseudolesions (P < 0.05). Using univariate analysis, a location distant from the liver capsule was the most discriminating variable to differentiate between true and pseudolesions (P = 0.0060). Hyperattenuating content and round shape were the most sensitive criteria (sensitivity = 90.91% and 86.36%, respectively) for the diagnosis of true lesions, and heterogeneity, vascular displacement and encapsulation were the three most specific ones (specificity = 100.00%). Best accuracy was obtained with an association of the three variables (accuracy = 86.36%). CONCLUSION: Helical CT provides objective and discriminating morphological criteria to differentiate between true lesions and pseudolesions in patients with fatty liver.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the potential of helical CT for differentiating true lesions from pseudolesions in patients with fatty liver. METHODS: Helical CT of 44 patients with diffuse fatty liver (22 with true lesions; 22 with pseudolesions) were reviewed by two observers with regard to morphological features of visible lesions. Univariate analysis was used to detect discriminating criteria for the diagnosis of true lesions. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was excellent for 9/10 morphological criteria (kappa = 0.831-1). True lesions were more frequently distant from the liver capsule (50.00% vs. 4.55%), located in the right lobe (72.73% vs. 31.82%), round (86.36% vs. 54.55%), heterogeneous (27.27% vs. 0.00%) and had ill-defined margins (40.91% vs. 13.64%) compared with pseudolesions (P < 0.05). Using univariate analysis, a location distant from the liver capsule was the most discriminating variable to differentiate between true and pseudolesions (P = 0.0060). Hyperattenuating content and round shape were the most sensitive criteria (sensitivity = 90.91% and 86.36%, respectively) for the diagnosis of true lesions, and heterogeneity, vascular displacement and encapsulation were the three most specific ones (specificity = 100.00%). Best accuracy was obtained with an association of the three variables (accuracy = 86.36%). CONCLUSION: Helical CT provides objective and discriminating morphological criteria to differentiate between true lesions and pseudolesions in patients with fatty liver.
Authors: M Raquel Oliva; Koenraad J Mortele; Enrika Segatto; Jonathan N Glickman; Sukru Mehmet Erturk; Pablo R Ros; Stuart G Silverman Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2006 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Sang Won Lee; Seong Ho Park; Kyoung Won Kim; Eugene K Choi; Yong Moon Shin; Pyo Nyun Kim; Kyoung Ho Lee; Eun Sil Yu; Shin Hwang; Sung-Gyu Lee Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 11.105