Literature DB >> 20083760

The UK proposals for revalidation of physicians: Implications for the recertification of surgeons.

George G Youngson1, Paul Knight, Leslie Hamilton, Irving Taylor, Arthur Tanner, James Steers, Claire Steel, Linda de Cossart.   

Abstract

The editorial titled "For the Protection of the Public and the Good of the Specialty: Maintenance of Certification" (published in the February 2009 issue of the Archives of Surgery) has prompted us to offer the following article to inform the debate about how assessing surgical care and sorting out the variables to be included in maintenance of certification may develop worldwide. The proposals for revalidation of UK physicians involve the relicensing of all physicians and recertification of all specialists on the specialist register of the General Medical Council. The process will be on a 5-year cycle and is currently under development by the General Medical Council. The Royal Colleges have been charged with creating the standards for recertification, and the responsibility will fall on the Royal Colleges to support their fellows and members as the new regulation is introduced and as it develops. This article outlines developments so far, with particular reference to surgeons.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20083760     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  1 in total

Review 1.  National programmes for validating physician competence and fitness for practice: a scoping review.

Authors:  Tanya Horsley; Jocelyn Lockyer; Elise Cogo; Jeanie Zeiter; Ford Bursey; Craig Campbell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 2.692

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.