Literature DB >> 20083389

Craniofacial morphological outcome following treatment with three different surgical protocols for complete unilateral cleft lip and palate: a premilinary study.

M Kulewicz1, Z Dudkiewicz.   

Abstract

This study compared craniofacial morphology between three groups of children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate, treated with different surgical protocols. The study included 66 10-year-old children (42 boys and 20 girls) with a complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (22 patients in each of the three groups). Children aged 7 months underwent one-stage surgery, performed by a single surgeon. During surgery, the soft and hard palate and the lip underwent correction. The difference between the groups depended on the hard palate closure. Group I patients had the mucoperiosteal flap elevated on both sides of the cleft. Group II patients had the mucoperiosteal flap elevated on the non-cleft side, and had only a minimal 2-3mm mucoperiosteal flap elevated on the cleft side. Group III patients had mucoperiostium elevated from the septum vomer to create a single-layered caudally pedicled flap, and had only a minimal 2-3mm palatal flap elevated on the cleft side. Craniofacial morphology was defined using lateral cephalometric analysis. Significant craniofacial morphological differences were identified between groups I, II and III. Group III demonstrated the most favourable morphology. This indicates that the technique of hard palate closure has significant influence on craniofacial growth and development. Copyright 2009 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20083389     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  5 in total

1.  Vomer flap for hard palate repair is related to favorable maxillary growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Yu-Fang Liao; Ying-Hsin Lee; Ruby Wang; Chiung-Shing Huang; Philip Kuo-Ting Chen; Lun-Jou Lo; Yu-Ray Chen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Early hard palate closure using a vomer flap in unilateral cleft lip and palate: effects on cleft width.

Authors:  Johanna P de Jong; Corstiaan C Breugem
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Management of post midface distraction occlusal discrepancy using temporary anchorage devices in a cleft patient.

Authors:  N K Koteswara Prasad; Syed Altaf Hussain; Arun B Chitharanjan; Jyotsna Murthy
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Apr

4.  Cleft Palate Repair without Lateral Relaxing Incision.

Authors:  Hisao Ogata; Yoshiaki Sakamoto; Kazuo Kishi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-03-13

5.  Modified two-flaps palatoplasty with lateral mucus relaxing incision in cleft repair: A STROBE-compliant retrospective study.

Authors:  Meizhen Gu; Xiuchang Huang; Hongming Xu; Fang Chen; Yugang Jiang; Xiaoyan Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.