Literature DB >> 20083257

Comparative study of inguinal hernia repair after radical prostatectomy, prostate biopsy, transurethral resection of the prostate or pelvic lymph node dissection.

Maxine Sun1, Giovanni Lughezzani, Ahmed Alasker, Hendrik Isbarn, Claudio Jeldres, Shahrokh F Shariat, Lars Budäus, Jean-Baptiste Lattouf, Luc Valiquette, Markus Graefen, Francesco Montorsi, Paul Perrotte, Pierre I Karakiewicz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Inguinal hernia is considered one of the major morbidities after radical prostatectomy. We compared inguinal hernia repair rates in patients treated with radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer relative to those of 2 nonsurgically treated groups of patients, namely individuals who underwent prostate biopsy or transurethral resection of the prostate, and a surgically treated group of patients who underwent pelvic lymph node dissection, within a large North American database.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Quebec Health Plan database we identified 5,478 men treated with radical prostatectomy vs 6,933, 7,697 and 532 who underwent prostate biopsy, transurethral resection of the prostate or pelvic lymph node dissection, respectively, between 1990 and 2000. Kaplan-Meier plots graphically explored inguinal hernia repair rates. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses examined variables associated with inguinal hernia repair after either group. Covariates consisted of age, year of treatment and the Charlson comorbidity index.
RESULTS: The 1, 2, 5 and 10-year inguinal hernia repair rates after radical prostatectomy were 4.4%, 6.7%, 11.7% and 17.1%, respectively. For the same points after prostate biopsy the rates were 1.7%, 2.9%, 6.1% and 9.8% vs 1.7%, 2.6%, 5.5% and 9.2%, respectively, after transurethral resection of the prostate, and 0.8%, 2.4%, 4.9% and 9.3% after pelvic lymph node dissection (pairwise log rank tests p <0.001). On multivariable Cox regression analyses the rate of inguinal hernia repair was 1.9, 2.1 and 1.7-fold higher for patients who underwent radical prostatectomy vs prostate biopsy, transurethral resection of the prostate and pelvic lymph node dissection, respectively (all p <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Radical prostatectomy predisposes to higher inguinal hernia repair rates than in the 3 examined control groups. A higher rate of inguinal hernia repair after radical prostatectomy warrants consideration in the discussion of radical prostatectomy perioperative complications. 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20083257     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  The cumulative incidence and risk factors of postoperative inguinal hernia in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ja Yoon Ku; Chan Ho Lee; Won Young Park; Nam Kyung Lee; Seung Hyun Baek; Hong Koo Ha
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Robotic radical prostatectomy with concomitant repair of inguinal hernia: is it safe?

Authors:  Travis Rogers; Eduardo Parra-Davila; Flavio Malcher; Carlos Hartmann; Bernardo Mastella; Guiherme de Araújo; Gabriel Ogaya-Pinies; Carlos Ortiz-Ortiz; Eduardo Hernandez-Cardona; Vipul Patel; Leandro Totti Cavazzola
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-08-22

Review 3.  Inguinal hernia after radical retropubic prostatectomy: risk factors and prevention.

Authors:  Johan Stranne; Pär Lodding
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  International guidelines for groin hernia management.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Laparoscopic Iliopubic Tract Repair with Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernioplasty after Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sung Ryul Lee; Geon Young Byun
Journal:  CRSLS       Date:  2021-04-01

6.  Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Alone or With Laparoscopic Herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  Orcun Celik; Murat Akand; Gokhan Ekin; Ibrahim Duman; Yusuf Ozlem Ilbey; Tibet Erdogru
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.