Literature DB >> 20083066

Impact of cardiac contractility modulation on left ventricular global and regional function and remodeling.

Cheuk-Man Yu1, Joseph Yat-Sun Chan, Qing Zhang, Gabriel W K Yip, Yat-Yin Lam, Anna Chan, Daniel Burkhoff, Pui-Wai Lee, Jeffrey Wing-Hong Fung.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) on left ventricular (LV) size and myocardial function.
BACKGROUND: CCM is a device-based therapy for patients with advanced heart failure. Previous studies showed that CCM improved symptoms and exercise capacity; however, comprehensive assessment of LV structure, function, and reverse remodeling is not available.
METHODS: Thirty patients (60 + or - 11 years, 80% male) with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III heart failure, ejection fraction <35%, and QRS <120 ms were assessed at baseline and 3 months. LV reverse remodeling was measured by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography. Using tissue Doppler imaging, the peak systolic velocity (Sm) and peak early diastolic velocity (Em) were calculated for LV function, while the standard deviation of the time to peak systolic velocity (Ts-SD) and the time to peak early diastolic velocity (Te-SD) were calculated for mechanical dyssynchrony.
RESULTS: LV reverse remodeling was evident, with a reduction in LV end-systolic volume by -11.5 + or - 10.5% and a gain in ejection fraction by 4.8 + or - 3.6% (both p < 0.001). Myocardial contraction was improved in all LV walls, including sites remote from CCM delivery (all p < 0.05); hence, the mean Sm of 12 (2.2 + or - 0.6 cm/s vs. 2.5 + or - 0.7 cm/s) or 6 basal LV segments (2.5 + or - 0.6 cm/s vs. 3.0 + or - 0.7 cm/s) were increased significantly (both p < 0.001). In contrast, CCM had no impact on regional or global Em (2.9 + or - 1.3 cm/s vs. 2.9 + or - 1.1 cm/s), whereas Ts-SD (28.2 + or - 11.2 ms vs. 27.9 + or - 12.7 ms) and Te-SD (30.0 + or - 18.3 ms vs. 30.1 + or - 20.7 ms) remained unchanged (all p = NS). Mitral regurgitation was reduced (22 + or - 14% vs. 17 + or - 15%, p = 0.02). Clinically, there was improvement of NYHA functional class (p < 0.001) and 6-min hall walk distance (p = 0.015). A 24-h Holter monitor showed that premature ventricular contractions were not increased during CCM.
CONCLUSIONS: CCM improves both global and regional LV contractility, including regions remote from the impulse delivery, and may contribute to LV reverse remodeling and gain in systolic function. Such improvement is unrelated to diastolic function or mechanical dyssynchrony.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20083066     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  18 in total

Review 1.  [Cardiac contractility modulation. A new form of therapy for patients with heart failure and narrow QRS complex?].

Authors:  T Kleemann
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 2.  Cardiac contractility modulation therapy in advanced systolic heart failure.

Authors:  Alexander R Lyon; Michael A Samara; David S Feldman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  [Current impact of cardiac implantable electronic devices].

Authors:  J Kuschyk; B Rudic; M Borggrefe; I Akin
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 4.  Assessment of ventricular remodeling in heart failure clinical trials.

Authors:  James N Kirkpatrick; Martin St John Sutton
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2012-12

5.  Cardiac Contractility Modulation in a Model of Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot: A Sheep Model.

Authors:  Francois Roubertie; Romain Eschalier; Adlane Zemmoura; Jean-Benoit Thambo; Caroline Rooryck; Louis Labrousse; Sylvain Ploux; Philippe Ritter; Michel Haïssaguerre; Pierre Dos Santos; Pierre Bordachar
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 6.  Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction And A Narrow QRS Complex: Combination Of A Subcutaneous Defibrillator With Cardiac Contractility Modulation.

Authors:  Susanne Röger; Martin Borggrefe; Jürgen Kuschyk
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-10-31

Review 7.  [Cardiac contractility modulation for treatment of chronic heart failure].

Authors:  J Kuschyk; B Rudic; V Liebe; E Tülümen; M Borggrefe; I Akin
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2018-10-25

Review 8.  [Cardiac contractility modulation].

Authors:  J Kuschyk; B Rudic; M Borggrefe; I Akin
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 9.  Electrical modalities beyond pacing for the treatment of heart failure.

Authors:  Richard N Cornelussen; Vincent Splett; Ruth Nicholson Klepfer; Berthold Stegemann; Lilian Kornet; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.214

10.  The acute inotropic effects of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) are associated with action potential duration shortening and mediated by β1-adrenoceptor signalling.

Authors:  James Winter; Kieran E Brack; G André Ng
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 5.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.