Literature DB >> 20082868

DNA copy number changes in gastric adenocarcinomas: high resolution-comparative genomic hybridization study in Turkey.

Güvem Gümüs-Akay1, Ali Ekrem Unal, Atilla Halil Elhan, Sancar Bayar, Kürsat Karadayt, Asuman Sunguroglu, Ahmet Kadikiran, Ajlan Tükün.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Multiple genetic alterations are responsible for development and progression of gastric cancer which is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The aim of this study was to identify the genomic imbalances of gains and/or losses in gastric adenocarcinomas from Turkish patients and to investigate their association with development and progression of this type of cancer.
METHODS: Forty three patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were enrolled in this study and genomic imbalances were analyzed by high-resolution-comparative genomic hybridization (HR-CGH).
RESULTS: In 36/43 cases (84%) of gastric adenocarcinomas, genomic imbalances have involved all chromosomes in various combinations. The mean number of gains was 3.95+/-4.19 and the most common gains observed were 7q (35%), 8q (35%), 7p (28%), 1q (26%), 13q (26%), and 20q (21%). The calculated mean number of losses was 3.65+/-3.55 and the most common losses were found on arms 18q (26%), 5q (21%), and 14q (21%). High-level amplifications involved chromosomes 1, 7, 8, 9, 13, and 16. No significant differences in chromosomal imbalances were observed in different tumor stages, tumor grades, and Helicobacter pylori infection status groups. The most striking result in this study was the involvement of the 13q gains with increased lymph node metastasis (p=0.046). Late-stage tumors displayed a somewhat significantly higher number of losses than early-stage tumors (p=0.053).
CONCLUSIONS: A series of gains, losses and amplifications concerned with gastric adenocarcinoma identified in this study are presented in detail. In particular, 13q21-q32 was prominent because it has been linked to increased lymph node metastasis. 2009 IMSS. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20082868     DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2009.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Med Res        ISSN: 0188-4409            Impact factor:   2.235


  7 in total

1.  Diagnostic and prognostic significance of glypican 5 and glypican 6 gene expression levels in gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Melike Dinccelik-Aslan; Guvem Gumus-Akay; Atilla Halil Elhan; Ekrem Unal; Ajlan Tukun
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-01-19

2.  Recurrent amplification of MYC and TNFRSF11B in 8q24 is associated with poor survival in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Xiaohong Wang; Yiqiang Liu; Duanfang Shao; Ziliang Qian; Zhengwei Dong; Yun Sun; Xiaofang Xing; Xiaojing Cheng; Hong Du; Ying Hu; Yingai Li; Lin Li; Bin Dong; Ziyu Li; Aiwen Wu; Xiaojiang Wu; Zhaode Bu; Xianglong Zong; Guanshan Zhu; Qunsheng Ji; Xian-zi Wen; Lian-hai Zhang; Jia-fu Ji
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Global copy number analyses by next generation sequencing provide insight into pig genome variation.

Authors:  Jicai Jiang; Jiying Wang; Haifei Wang; Yan Zhang; Huimin Kang; Xiaotian Feng; Jiafu Wang; Zongjun Yin; Wenbin Bao; Qin Zhang; Jian-Feng Liu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  CHD1L Is a Marker for Poor Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Surgical Resection.

Authors:  Jiyeon Hyeon; Soomin Ahn; Cheol-Keun Park
Journal:  Korean J Pathol       Date:  2013-02-25

5.  SIX1 overexpression in diffuse-type and grade III gastric tumors: Features that are associated with poor prognosis.

Authors:  Modjtaba Emadi-Baygi; Parvaneh Nikpour; Elaheh Emadi-Andani
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2015-07-27

6.  Chromosome 8q as the most frequent target for amplification in early gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Ji Un Kang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  The association between DNA copy number aberrations at chromosome 5q22 and gastric cancer.

Authors:  Pei-Chien Tsai; Szu-Wei Huang; Hsiang-Lin Tsai; Cheng-Jen Ma; Ming-Feng Hou; I-Ping Yang; Yung-Song Wang; Suh-Hang Hank Juo; Jaw-Yuan Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.